Naya Kashmir Manifesto, Article 370 and The Unbecoming of Autonomy

This article examines the ideological (un)becoming of Article 370 by undertaking a critical analysis of the Naya Kashmir Manifesto and its genesis in the tumultuous decade of the 1940s and juxtaposing this with the evolving realpolitik of both Kashmiri political culture and the Indian nation-state to demonstrate the gradual untenability of the autonomy discourse within the larger discourse of territorial sovereignty of post-colonial nationhood. While the ideological tenets of Naya Kashmir were meticulously drafted, remodelling the Stalin Constitution of 1936 to suit the sociopolitical realities of J&K, the manifesto remains conspicuously silent on the region’s future following the withdrawal of British imperial rule. Unpacking the processes through which the ideology of autonomy was not merely challenged but systematically undone, the article delineates the tensions between the idealism of regional autonomy and the realpolitik of territorial sovereignty of nation-state formation. It demonstrates that autonomy, once imagined as the cornerstone of Kashmir’s political selfhood, became increasingly untenable within the centralising logic of the Indian nation-state.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
South Asia Research
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02627280261438864
Primary Topic
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Naya Kashmir Manifesto, Article 370 and The Unbecoming of Autonomy

Yasir Hamid, Mohammad Asif Najar
South Asia Research
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
article

Naya Kashmir Manifesto, Article 370 and The Unbecoming of Autonomy

Yasir Hamid, Mohammad Asif Najar
article en

Abstract

This article examines the ideological (un)becoming of Article 370 by undertaking a critical analysis of the Naya Kashmir Manifesto and its genesis in the tumultuous decade of the 1940s and juxtaposing this with the evolving realpolitik of both Kashmiri political culture and the Indian nation-state to demonstrate the gradual untenability of the autonomy discourse within the larger discourse of territorial sovereignty of post-colonial nationhood. While the ideological tenets of Naya Kashmir were meticulously drafted, remodelling the Stalin Constitution of 1936 to suit the sociopolitical realities of J&K, the manifesto remains conspicuously silent on the region’s future following the withdrawal of British imperial rule. Unpacking the processes through which the ideology of autonomy was not merely challenged but systematically undone, the article delineates the tensions between the idealism of regional autonomy and the realpolitik of territorial sovereignty of nation-state formation. It demonstrates that autonomy, once imagined as the cornerstone of Kashmir’s political selfhood, became increasingly untenable within the centralising logic of the Indian nation-state.

South Asia Research
University of Kashmir (IN), Jamia Millia Islamia (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.