Impacts of a Produce Prescription Program on Food Security, Diet Quality, and Psychosocial Health of Adults with Medicaid and Chronic Health Conditions: A 12-Month Longitudinal Evaluation

BACKGROUND: Food insecurity (FI) is a driver of chronic disease. Produce prescription (PRx) interventions pair access to produce with education, but evidence among Medicaid-insured adults remains limited. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the impact of PRx on FI, fruit and vegetable (FV) intake, and psychosocial and clinical outcomes among adults with chronic conditions. DESIGN: Prospective, non-randomized cohort study with a matched comparison group. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 125 Medicaid-insured, food-insecure adults with chronic metabolic conditions were enrolled in the intervention cohort and 92 matched to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)-only cohort. INTERVENTION: Weekly home-delivered produce, registered dietitian-led coaching, and education over 12 months. MAIN MEASURES: FI (USDA 10-item Food Security Survey Module), FV intake (National Cancer Institute screener), depression (PHQ-9), loneliness (UCLA 3-item), fatigue (FACIT-F), healthcare utilization and costs, and blood pressure (BP). For the comparison cohort, some measures were obtained for 6 months of follow-up. KEY RESULTS: At 6 months, based on between-group differences, PRx was associated with greater improvements in FV intake (difference in change: + 0.3 vs. + 0.03 cups/day, p = 0.002) and greater reductions in loneliness (difference in change: -0.6 points, p = 0.022). Between-group differences for FI (-8.2 percentage points, p = 0.26) and moderate-to-severe depression (-10.8 percentage points, p = 0.07) favored PRx but were not statistically significant. At 12 months, no significant between-group differences in healthcare utilization and costs were observed. Among the 105 (84%) intervention participants who completed 12-month follow-up, between the pre- and post-intervention periods, FI declined by 17.1% (p = 0.003), FV intake increased by 0.4 cups/day (p < 0.001), fatigue improved by 3.1 points (p = 0.019), and among participants with elevated baseline BP (n = 73), systolic BP decreased by 8.6 mmHg (p = 0.003). DISCUSSION: In this study, PRx was associated with improved diet quality and loneliness compared with a SNAP-only comparison. Within-group analyses demonstrated improvements across dietary, psychosocial, and BP outcomes, supporting further evaluation using randomized or comparative designs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-026-10390-x
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impacts of a Produce Prescription Program on Food Security, Diet Quality, and Psychosocial Health of Adults with Medicaid and Chronic Health Conditions: A 12-Month Longitudinal Evaluation

Rachel Zimmer, Charlotte Crotts, Lindsey Abdelfattah, Diane Shenberger et al.
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

Impacts of a Produce Prescription Program on Food Security, Diet Quality, and Psychosocial Health of Adults with Medicaid and Chronic Health Conditions: A 12-Month Longitudinal Evaluation

Rachel Zimmer, Charlotte Crotts, Lindsey Abdelfattah, Diane Shenberger, Amresh Hanchate, Sarah Birken
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Food insecurity (FI) is a driver of chronic disease. Produce prescription (PRx) interventions pair access to produce with education, but evidence among Medicaid-insured adults remains limited. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the impact of PRx on FI, fruit and vegetable (FV) intake, and psychosocial and clinical outcomes among adults with chronic conditions. DESIGN: Prospective, non-randomized cohort study with a matched comparison group. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 125 Medicaid-insured, food-insecure adults with chronic metabolic conditions were enrolled in the intervention cohort and 92 matched to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)-only cohort. INTERVENTION: Weekly home-delivered produce, registered dietitian-led coaching, and education over 12 months. MAIN MEASURES: FI (USDA 10-item Food Security Survey Module), FV intake (National Cancer Institute screener), depression (PHQ-9), loneliness (UCLA 3-item), fatigue (FACIT-F), healthcare utilization and costs, and blood pressure (BP). For the comparison cohort, some measures were obtained for 6 months of follow-up. KEY RESULTS: At 6 months, based on between-group differences, PRx was associated with greater improvements in FV intake (difference in change: + 0.3 vs. + 0.03 cups/day, p = 0.002) and greater reductions in loneliness (difference in change: -0.6 points, p = 0.022). Between-group differences for FI (-8.2 percentage points, p = 0.26) and moderate-to-severe depression (-10.8 percentage points, p = 0.07) favored PRx but were not statistically significant. At 12 months, no significant between-group differences in healthcare utilization and costs were observed. Among the 105 (84%) intervention participants who completed 12-month follow-up, between the pre- and post-intervention periods, FI declined by 17.1% (p = 0.003), FV intake increased by 0.4 cups/day (p < 0.001), fatigue improved by 3.1 points (p = 0.019), and among participants with elevated baseline BP (n = 73), systolic BP decreased by 8.6 mmHg (p = 0.003). DISCUSSION: In this study, PRx was associated with improved diet quality and loneliness compared with a SNAP-only comparison. Within-group analyses demonstrated improvements across dietary, psychosocial, and BP outcomes, supporting further evaluation using randomized or comparative designs.

Journal of General Internal Medicine
Research Applications (United States) (US), Wake Forest University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Wake Forest University, Health Resources and Services Administration, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Bureau of Health Workforce
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.