Quantification of Imaging Suite–Level Energy Patterns in MRI, CT, and PET/CT to Guide Energy Efficiency

Background The urgency for systemic change in how care, particularly energy-intensive advanced imaging services, is delivered and managed is evident, as the emissions associated with these services are adversely affecting human health. Although the energy demand from the main power supply (ie, electricity directly powering the imaging hardware) has been well characterized, imaging suite-level quantification that includes the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) and chilled water subsystems is not yet understood. Purpose To comprehensively assess imaging suite-level energy by quantifying energy demands from main power, HVAC, and chilled water subsystems. Materials and Methods Power, temperature, and flow meters were permanently installed in four imaging suites (3-T MRI, 1.5-T MRI, CT, and PET/CT) to measure energy patterns for the main power, HVAC, and MRI chilled water subsystems in an outpatient facility. Software was developed to calculate suite-level energy consumption over a 30-day period. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize power and energy consumption values across all subsystems (main power, HVAC, and chilled water) and imaging suites. Results Projected suite-level total annual energy consumption was 277.9, 211.5, 54.8, and 117.2 MWh for the 3-T MRI, 1.5-T MRI, CT, and PET/CT suites, respectively, equivalent to the annual electricity use of 25.8, 19.6, 5.1, and 10.9 average U.S. homes. Main power dominated MRI suite energy demand, accounting for 64.63% (179.6 of 277.9 MWh per year) and 72.72% (153.8 of 211.5 MWh per year) of the total for 3-T and 1.5-T MRI, respectively. The HVAC (9.97% [27.7 of 277.9]; 17.45% [36.9 of 211.5], respectively) and chilled water (25.40% [70.6 of 277.9]; 9.83% [20.8 of 211.5], respectively) subsystems also contributed. In CT and PET/CT suites, HVAC was the primary driver of demand (68.8% [37.7 of 54.8 MWh per year]; 64.76% [75.9 of 117.2 MWh per year], respectively), with the remaining attributed to main power. Conclusion Suite-level quantification revealed modality- and subsystem-specific energy patterns, where main power dominated MRI suite energy, and HVAC dominated CT and PET/CT suite energy. © RSNA, 2026

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.253128
Primary Topic
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantification of Imaging Suite–Level Energy Patterns in MRI, CT, and PET/CT to Guide Energy Efficiency

Elizabeth Ann Morris, Andrew M. Hernandez, Michael T. Corwin, Youngkyoo Jung et al.
Radiology
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
article

Quantification of Imaging Suite–Level Energy Patterns in MRI, CT, and PET/CT to Guide Energy Efficiency

Elizabeth Ann Morris, Andrew M. Hernandez, Michael T. Corwin, Youngkyoo Jung, Ramsey Alizadeh, Sarah Yoon
article en

Abstract

Background The urgency for systemic change in how care, particularly energy-intensive advanced imaging services, is delivered and managed is evident, as the emissions associated with these services are adversely affecting human health. Although the energy demand from the main power supply (ie, electricity directly powering the imaging hardware) has been well characterized, imaging suite-level quantification that includes the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) and chilled water subsystems is not yet understood. Purpose To comprehensively assess imaging suite-level energy by quantifying energy demands from main power, HVAC, and chilled water subsystems. Materials and Methods Power, temperature, and flow meters were permanently installed in four imaging suites (3-T MRI, 1.5-T MRI, CT, and PET/CT) to measure energy patterns for the main power, HVAC, and MRI chilled water subsystems in an outpatient facility. Software was developed to calculate suite-level energy consumption over a 30-day period. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize power and energy consumption values across all subsystems (main power, HVAC, and chilled water) and imaging suites. Results Projected suite-level total annual energy consumption was 277.9, 211.5, 54.8, and 117.2 MWh for the 3-T MRI, 1.5-T MRI, CT, and PET/CT suites, respectively, equivalent to the annual electricity use of 25.8, 19.6, 5.1, and 10.9 average U.S. homes. Main power dominated MRI suite energy demand, accounting for 64.63% (179.6 of 277.9 MWh per year) and 72.72% (153.8 of 211.5 MWh per year) of the total for 3-T and 1.5-T MRI, respectively. The HVAC (9.97% [27.7 of 277.9]; 17.45% [36.9 of 211.5], respectively) and chilled water (25.40% [70.6 of 277.9]; 9.83% [20.8 of 211.5], respectively) subsystems also contributed. In CT and PET/CT suites, HVAC was the primary driver of demand (68.8% [37.7 of 54.8 MWh per year]; 64.76% [75.9 of 117.2 MWh per year], respectively), with the remaining attributed to main power. Conclusion Suite-level quantification revealed modality- and subsystem-specific energy patterns, where main power dominated MRI suite energy, and HVAC dominated CT and PET/CT suite energy. © RSNA, 2026

RadiologyVol. 319(1)
University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
RSNA Research and Education Foundation
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.