Validation of the Russian version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire

The digital transformation of the economy and rising labor demands have increased the relevance of psychosocial risk management. The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) is a widely used international tool for assessing these risks. This study aimed to validate the Russian version of COPSOQ III (COPSOQ-RU) to ensure its reliability and applicability for assessing psychosocial risks in Russian workplaces. The questionnaire was translated, culturally adapted, and piloted with 290 participants. The main survey included 1,075 valid responses. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha (all dimensions > 0.60). Construct validity was assessed through exploratory factor analysis (EFA), which identified 22 factors explaining 65.9% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) demonstrated excellent model fit (CFI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.049, SRMR = 0.056). Most dimensions demonstrated satisfactory reliability and exhibited valid factor structures. However, certain items required revision. Strong correlations were identified between psychosocial risk dimensions and outcomes such as burnout and job satisfaction. The COPSOQ-RU was shown to be a valid and reliable tool for assessing psychosocial risks in Russian workplaces. Its implementation can support evidence-based occupational health interventions and contribute to improving employee well-being and working conditions in Russia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2026.2649753
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Russian version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire

Sergey V. Kuzmin, Anna V. Novikova, Vasiliy A. Shirokov, Aleksandra S. Perevezentseva et al.
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
article

Validation of the Russian version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire

Sergey V. Kuzmin, Anna V. Novikova, Vasiliy A. Shirokov, Aleksandra S. Perevezentseva, Aleksandr A. Novikov
article en

Abstract

The digital transformation of the economy and rising labor demands have increased the relevance of psychosocial risk management. The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) is a widely used international tool for assessing these risks. This study aimed to validate the Russian version of COPSOQ III (COPSOQ-RU) to ensure its reliability and applicability for assessing psychosocial risks in Russian workplaces. The questionnaire was translated, culturally adapted, and piloted with 290 participants. The main survey included 1,075 valid responses. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha (all dimensions > 0.60). Construct validity was assessed through exploratory factor analysis (EFA), which identified 22 factors explaining 65.9% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) demonstrated excellent model fit (CFI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.049, SRMR = 0.056). Most dimensions demonstrated satisfactory reliability and exhibited valid factor structures. However, certain items required revision. Strong correlations were identified between psychosocial risk dimensions and outcomes such as burnout and job satisfaction. The COPSOQ-RU was shown to be a valid and reliable tool for assessing psychosocial risks in Russian workplaces. Its implementation can support evidence-based occupational health interventions and contribute to improving employee well-being and working conditions in Russia.

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Sir Syed University of Engineering and Technology (PK), Federal Scientific Center for Vegetable Growing (RU), Cosmos Corporation (United States) (US), Ekaterinburg Research Institute of Viral Infections (RU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.