Proximate composition and sensory evaluation of gluten-free bar formulated from rice and soybean flour

Background: The growing prevalence of celiac disease and gluten intolerance is driving up the need for gluten-free food choices suitable for both adults and children. Objective: This research evaluates the formulation of a gluten-free bar, utilizing rice flour, soybean flour, or a composite blend, with other enriching elements. Methods: Five different gluten-free bars were prepared from varying ratios of rice and soybean flour, and their proximate composition, colorimetric, and sensory properties were compared to wheat-based control bar. Results: The sensory analysis revealed that the formulation with 10% soybean and 30% rice blend ratio showed an overall higher acceptability score over the other formulations and compared to the control bar (total mean score = 45.72 and 42.94, respectively). Moreover, it has a favorable proximate composition of 10.5% protein, 4.6% fiber, and only 19.9% fat content compared to other formulations. The 40% rice flour formulation had the least sensory and chemical attributes compared to other formulations. Conclusions: The 10:30 soybean-rice formulation with fortifying ingredients achieved superior consumer acceptability while maintaining an optimal proximate profile, establishing an evidence-based benchmark for the industrial scale-up of high-protein, gluten-free bars. However, further research is required to optimize shelf-life stability for commercial distribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.21101
Primary Topic
Food composition and properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proximate composition and sensory evaluation of gluten-free bar formulated from rice and soybean flour

Alaa Nafea, Mahmoud H. Abughoush, Imranul Choudhury, Marwan El-Deyarbi et al.
PeerJ
Food composition and properties
article

Proximate composition and sensory evaluation of gluten-free bar formulated from rice and soybean flour

Alaa Nafea, Mahmoud H. Abughoush, Imranul Choudhury, Marwan El-Deyarbi, Huda Alnuaimi, Zelal S. Adi, Abeer Aljaoune, Shorouk Aldeyarbi, Abdulla Almatrooshi, Shaimaa Hegazy, Hamza Aljuboori, Ashraf A. Hussein
article en

Abstract

Background: The growing prevalence of celiac disease and gluten intolerance is driving up the need for gluten-free food choices suitable for both adults and children. Objective: This research evaluates the formulation of a gluten-free bar, utilizing rice flour, soybean flour, or a composite blend, with other enriching elements. Methods: Five different gluten-free bars were prepared from varying ratios of rice and soybean flour, and their proximate composition, colorimetric, and sensory properties were compared to wheat-based control bar. Results: The sensory analysis revealed that the formulation with 10% soybean and 30% rice blend ratio showed an overall higher acceptability score over the other formulations and compared to the control bar (total mean score = 45.72 and 42.94, respectively). Moreover, it has a favorable proximate composition of 10.5% protein, 4.6% fiber, and only 19.9% fat content compared to other formulations. The 40% rice flour formulation had the least sensory and chemical attributes compared to other formulations. Conclusions: The 10:30 soybean-rice formulation with fortifying ingredients achieved superior consumer acceptability while maintaining an optimal proximate profile, establishing an evidence-based benchmark for the industrial scale-up of high-protein, gluten-free bars. However, further research is required to optimize shelf-life stability for commercial distribution.

PeerJVol. 14
Abu Dhabi University (AE), Al Ain University (AE), Ajman University (AE), United Arab Emirates University (AE), Port Said University (EG)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Food composition and properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.