Patient Preferences in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance: A Multi-site Conjoint Analysis

BACKGROUND: Several emerging modalities are available for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance; however, patient preferences for surveillance tests - particularly across key subgroups such as race/ethnicity, income, and education level - are poorly characterized. METHODS: We conducted a choice-based conjoint survey among patients with cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis B undergoing HCC surveillance (from 2022-2024) at seven centers in the US. Participants were presented with 15 scenarios, where they chose between surveillance modalities based on test attributes. RESULTS: We included 649 patients, with a median age of 60 years, 51% male, 60% White, 10% Black, and 20% Hispanic. The cohort reflected substantial socioeconomic variation including 12% with Medicaid and 38% with Medicare. The highest priority attribute was surveillance benefits (42.9%; 95% CI: 40.6-45.1%), followed by financial harms (19.4%; 95% CI: 18.1-20.7%). Patients placed less priority on test logistics (12.3%; 95% CI: 11.5-13.2%), test location (9.2%; 95% CI: 8.5-10.0%), test duration (8.3%; 95% CI: 7.8-8.7%), and physical harms (7.9%; 95% CI: 7.2-8.6%). In subgroup analyses, Black participants placed significantly lower importance on surveillance benefits and higher importance on financial harms (p<0.001) and test duration (p=0.001) compared to White participants. Hispanic participants also prioritized financial harms more than non-Hispanic participants (p<0.001), a pattern consistent with cost-related concerns seen across other lower socioeconomic status (SES) subgroups. Lower SES individuals with below a high school education (p=0.01), Medicaid insurance (p=0.001), and income below $25,000 (p<0.001) assigned greater importance to financial harms and less to surveillance benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with undergoing HCC surveillance prioritize surveillance test sensitivity; however, results vary by race, ethnicity, and SES. Improving access by reducing financial and logistical barriers through shared-decision-making may enhance surveillance, particularly when modalities present with similar effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2026-04-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000004023
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient Preferences in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance: A Multi-site Conjoint Analysis

Manaf Alsudaney, Maarouf Hoteit, Lisa Quirk, Amit G. Singal et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

Patient Preferences in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance: A Multi-site Conjoint Analysis

Manaf Alsudaney, Maarouf Hoteit, Lisa Quirk, Amit G. Singal, Sean Woolen, Neehar D. Parikh, Reena Salgia, Darine Daher, Nishi Patel, Karim Seif El Dahan, Jonathan P. Troost, Karissa D. Kao, Prasun K. Jalal, Perla Hernandez, Neil Mehta, Jasmine Gamez, Megha Bhongade, Anish Nayak, Ju Dong Yang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several emerging modalities are available for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance; however, patient preferences for surveillance tests - particularly across key subgroups such as race/ethnicity, income, and education level - are poorly characterized. METHODS: We conducted a choice-based conjoint survey among patients with cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis B undergoing HCC surveillance (from 2022-2024) at seven centers in the US. Participants were presented with 15 scenarios, where they chose between surveillance modalities based on test attributes. RESULTS: We included 649 patients, with a median age of 60 years, 51% male, 60% White, 10% Black, and 20% Hispanic. The cohort reflected substantial socioeconomic variation including 12% with Medicaid and 38% with Medicare. The highest priority attribute was surveillance benefits (42.9%; 95% CI: 40.6-45.1%), followed by financial harms (19.4%; 95% CI: 18.1-20.7%). Patients placed less priority on test logistics (12.3%; 95% CI: 11.5-13.2%), test location (9.2%; 95% CI: 8.5-10.0%), test duration (8.3%; 95% CI: 7.8-8.7%), and physical harms (7.9%; 95% CI: 7.2-8.6%). In subgroup analyses, Black participants placed significantly lower importance on surveillance benefits and higher importance on financial harms (p<0.001) and test duration (p=0.001) compared to White participants. Hispanic participants also prioritized financial harms more than non-Hispanic participants (p<0.001), a pattern consistent with cost-related concerns seen across other lower socioeconomic status (SES) subgroups. Lower SES individuals with below a high school education (p=0.01), Medicaid insurance (p=0.001), and income below $25,000 (p<0.001) assigned greater importance to financial harms and less to surveillance benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with undergoing HCC surveillance prioritize surveillance test sensitivity; however, results vary by race, ethnicity, and SES. Improving access by reducing financial and logistical barriers through shared-decision-making may enhance surveillance, particularly when modalities present with similar effectiveness.

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), University of Michigan (US), Henry Ford Hospital (US), University of California System (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.