Does Islamist terrorism still affect political attitudes?

Abstract Recent literature suggests that citizens in Western democracies have become desensitized to Islamist terrorism and that Islamist attacks therefore no longer evoke the same changes in political attitudes as before. However, this hypothesis remains undertheorized and has not been systematically tested. We develop a theoretical framework that positions desensitization alongside alternative trajectories of public responsiveness and subject it to two complementary tests. In Study 1, we draw on a meta-analytic dataset of over 170 previous studies and 800 effect estimates to assess whether public reactions to Islamist terrorism have changed as a result of repeated exposure. In Study 2, we conduct a more controlled comparison of the effects of two recent Islamist terrorist attacks using a comparable research design and a new data source. Across both studies, we find little evidence that responsiveness has systemically diminished – or increased – over time, calling into question the presumed erosion of the effects of Islamist terrorism on political attitudes in Western democracies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Political Research
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1475676526101017
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Islamist terrorism still affect political attitudes?

Fernando Mendez, Micha Germann, Amélie Godefroidt
European Journal of Political Research
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Does Islamist terrorism still affect political attitudes?

Fernando Mendez, Micha Germann, Amélie Godefroidt
article en

Abstract

Abstract Recent literature suggests that citizens in Western democracies have become desensitized to Islamist terrorism and that Islamist attacks therefore no longer evoke the same changes in political attitudes as before. However, this hypothesis remains undertheorized and has not been systematically tested. We develop a theoretical framework that positions desensitization alongside alternative trajectories of public responsiveness and subject it to two complementary tests. In Study 1, we draw on a meta-analytic dataset of over 170 previous studies and 800 effect estimates to assess whether public reactions to Islamist terrorism have changed as a result of repeated exposure. In Study 2, we conduct a more controlled comparison of the effects of two recent Islamist terrorist attacks using a comparable research design and a new data source. Across both studies, we find little evidence that responsiveness has systemically diminished – or increased – over time, calling into question the presumed erosion of the effects of Islamist terrorism on political attitudes in Western democracies.

European Journal of Political Research
University of Zurich (CH), Institut d'Economie Scientifique Et de Gestion (FR), University of Bath (GB), KU Leuven (BE)
Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet, University of Warwick, University of Oxford, University of Bath, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaamse regering, Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does Islamist terrorism still affect political attitudes? — Fernando Mendez, Micha Germann, et al. · European Journal of Political Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS