The Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Hemodynamic Response during Double-Lumen Tube Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Double-lumen tube (DLT) insertion, which is often necessary to isolate the lung in thoracic surgeries, causes a significant and prolonged stress response. This study aims to evaluate the effect of a single preinduction bolus of dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg on hemodynamic responses to DLT insertion and fiberoptic confirmation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective randomized control trial, 60 patients coming for thoracic surgery requiring DLT insertion were recruited. Thirty were assigned to the dexmedetomidine group (A) and 30 to the placebo group (B). Group A received 0.5 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine, and Group B received normal saline over 10 min. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were recorded at baseline, after study drug administration, just before intubation, at intubation, and thereafter at regular intervals up to 30 min. Usage of supplementary anesthetics and rescue medications was noted. RESULTS: Patients in Group A had lower HR after study drug administration (P < 0.001), before intubation (P < 0.001), at intubation (P < 0.001), and at various other time points. Group A had lower SBP (P = 0.049) and DBP (P = 0.005) after study drug administration. Fewer patients in Group A required additional propofol (14 vs. 27) (P < 0.001) and lesser doses (21.3 vs. 41.0 mg) (P = 0.008). Lesser Group A patients required additional fentanyl (15 vs. 21) (P = 0.114). More patients in Group A required ephedrine (P = 0.038). Use of phenylephrine and atropine was comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine worked as an excellent adjuvant to anesthesia, providing good HR control and hemodynamic stability during DLT insertion and fiberoptic bronchoscopy confirmation. It decreases the overall anesthetic requirements and causes minimal side effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_188_25
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Hemodynamic Response during Double-Lumen Tube Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Reshma Vithayathil, Balaji Kuppuswamy, Gladdy George, Vinay M. Rao et al.
Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

The Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Hemodynamic Response during Double-Lumen Tube Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Reshma Vithayathil, Balaji Kuppuswamy, Gladdy George, Vinay M. Rao, Mahasampath Gowri, M. R. Hari Govind, Raj Sahajanadanan
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Double-lumen tube (DLT) insertion, which is often necessary to isolate the lung in thoracic surgeries, causes a significant and prolonged stress response. This study aims to evaluate the effect of a single preinduction bolus of dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg on hemodynamic responses to DLT insertion and fiberoptic confirmation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective randomized control trial, 60 patients coming for thoracic surgery requiring DLT insertion were recruited. Thirty were assigned to the dexmedetomidine group (A) and 30 to the placebo group (B). Group A received 0.5 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine, and Group B received normal saline over 10 min. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were recorded at baseline, after study drug administration, just before intubation, at intubation, and thereafter at regular intervals up to 30 min. Usage of supplementary anesthetics and rescue medications was noted. RESULTS: Patients in Group A had lower HR after study drug administration (P < 0.001), before intubation (P < 0.001), at intubation (P < 0.001), and at various other time points. Group A had lower SBP (P = 0.049) and DBP (P = 0.005) after study drug administration. Fewer patients in Group A required additional propofol (14 vs. 27) (P < 0.001) and lesser doses (21.3 vs. 41.0 mg) (P = 0.008). Lesser Group A patients required additional fentanyl (15 vs. 21) (P = 0.114). More patients in Group A required ephedrine (P = 0.038). Use of phenylephrine and atropine was comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine worked as an excellent adjuvant to anesthesia, providing good HR control and hemodynamic stability during DLT insertion and fiberoptic bronchoscopy confirmation. It decreases the overall anesthetic requirements and causes minimal side effects.

Annals of Cardiac AnaesthesiaVol. 29(2)
Christian Medical College, Vellore (IN), Bangalore Baptist Hospital (IN), Christian Medical College (IN), Bedford Hospital (GB), Sultan Qaboos University (OM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.