Clinical Outcomes Based on the Corneal Limbus–Scleral Tunnel Distance in Flanged Intrascleral Intraocular Lens Fixation
Purpose: To compare the anatomical and clinical outcomes based on the distance from the corneal limbus to the scleral tunnel in flanged intrascleral intraocular lens (IOL) fixation.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients who underwent scleral fixation of flanged IOLs. Group 1 (54 eyes) had a distance of 2.1 mm from the corneal limbus to the scleral tunnel, and Group 2 (48 eyes) had a distance of 2.8 mm. We evaluated the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), postoperative complications, IOL tilt and decentration, refractive prediction error (RPE), effective lens position, and iris-IOL distance.Results: The BCVA, postoperative complications, IOL tilt, and IOL decentration did not differ between the two groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The RPE showed a hyperopic shift in Group 1 and a myopic shift in Group 2 (Group 1: +0.24 ± 0.68 D, Group 2: -0.03 ± 0.43 D, <i>p</i> = 0.03). The iris-IOL distance was statistically longer in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (Group 1: 1.02 ± 0.40 mm, Group 2: 0.57 ± 0.32 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.02). The incidence of pupillary optic capture was significantly higher in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (Group 1; 0%, Group 2; 8.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.03).Conclusions: It should be considered that a shorter distance from the corneal limbus to the scleral tunnel results in a postoperative hyperopic shift and reduces the incidence of pupillary optic capture when performing flanged intrascleral IOLs fixation.
Authors
- Jae Rock (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0129-0682)
- Yong Koo Kang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6505-315X)
- David Kim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0522-7162)
- Dong Ho Park (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6911-3765)
- Yu Jin Kim
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society
- Published
- 2026-04-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2026.67.4.103
- Primary Topic
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00