“They Take it Out on All of Us”: Collective Punishment in Carceral Spaces

Legitimacy plays a crucial role in fostering order in prisons. When carceral staff are perceived as just, residents are more likely to follow institutional rules. Achieving procedural legitimacy is complicated by systemic barriers, including the use of collective punishment. Collective punishment is the sanctioning of a group because of the actions of one individual. Collective punishment can compromise rehabilitation and diminish procedural fairness. This study explores perceptions of collective punishment by analyzing data from interviews with residents and staff across eight prisons in four states. Findings reveal that residents and staff recognize collective punishment as pervasive. Residents report strain and injustice, whereas staff express concerns about its unintended consequences. The findings suggest that when punishment is indiscriminate, it undermines authority. By situating these findings within broader discussions on procedural legitimacy across hierarchical institutions, this research highlights the need for policies that prioritize fairness and targeted disciplinary measures over collective punishment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548261435854
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“They Take it Out on All of Us”: Collective Punishment in Carceral Spaces

Wyatt Brown, Danielle S. Rudes, Bryce Kushmerick-McCune, Aaron Flaherty
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

“They Take it Out on All of Us”: Collective Punishment in Carceral Spaces

Wyatt Brown, Danielle S. Rudes, Bryce Kushmerick-McCune, Aaron Flaherty
article en

Abstract

Legitimacy plays a crucial role in fostering order in prisons. When carceral staff are perceived as just, residents are more likely to follow institutional rules. Achieving procedural legitimacy is complicated by systemic barriers, including the use of collective punishment. Collective punishment is the sanctioning of a group because of the actions of one individual. Collective punishment can compromise rehabilitation and diminish procedural fairness. This study explores perceptions of collective punishment by analyzing data from interviews with residents and staff across eight prisons in four states. Findings reveal that residents and staff recognize collective punishment as pervasive. Residents report strain and injustice, whereas staff express concerns about its unintended consequences. The findings suggest that when punishment is indiscriminate, it undermines authority. By situating these findings within broader discussions on procedural legitimacy across hierarchical institutions, this research highlights the need for policies that prioritize fairness and targeted disciplinary measures over collective punishment.

Criminal Justice and Behavior
Transparency International (CZ), Sam Houston State University (US), Transparency Lab (Netherlands) (NL)
Bureau of Justice Assistance
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.