Evaluation of the nutrient content of dishes by the dish-version nutrient profile model in Japanese adults: the NHNS 2019

This study aimed to evaluate the nutrient content of dishes in Japan by applying a newly developed nutrient profile model for Japanese dishes using nationwide dietary data. Of the 71,526 dishes consumed, 92% were classified based on the dish criteria of the Japanese Food Guide and its extensions. We assessed staple, main, side, mixed main and side dishes, and mixed dishes with staples. The dish assessment was calculated using the dish-version nutrient profile model, which involved scoring dishes using subtracting recommended nutrient points from restricted nutrient points, indicating that a lower score is healthier. The overall score range for all dishes spanned from − 7 to 11 (10–90th percentile). By dish type, the score ranges were as follows: from − 1 to 9 (staple dishes), from − 8 to 9 (main dishes), from − 8 to 4 (side dishes), from − 2 to 20 (mixed dish of main and side), and 2–26 (mixed dish with staples). The findings clarified the score distribution of dishes in Japan using the dish-version nutrient profile model, reflecting the Japanese dietary pattern. This score distribution, as a multi-factor rating system, may provide useful insights for future research and potential applications in dish-based nutritional evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Nutrition
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-026-01322-3
Primary Topic
Nutritional Studies and Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the nutrient content of dishes by the dish-version nutrient profile model in Japanese adults: the NHNS 2019

Yuko Tousen, Chika Okada, Yoshiko Ishimi, Jun Takebayashi et al.
BMC Nutrition
Nutritional Studies and Diet
article

Evaluation of the nutrient content of dishes by the dish-version nutrient profile model in Japanese adults: the NHNS 2019

Yuko Tousen, Chika Okada, Yoshiko Ishimi, Jun Takebayashi, Hidemi Takimoto, Katsushi Yoshita
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the nutrient content of dishes in Japan by applying a newly developed nutrient profile model for Japanese dishes using nationwide dietary data. Of the 71,526 dishes consumed, 92% were classified based on the dish criteria of the Japanese Food Guide and its extensions. We assessed staple, main, side, mixed main and side dishes, and mixed dishes with staples. The dish assessment was calculated using the dish-version nutrient profile model, which involved scoring dishes using subtracting recommended nutrient points from restricted nutrient points, indicating that a lower score is healthier. The overall score range for all dishes spanned from − 7 to 11 (10–90th percentile). By dish type, the score ranges were as follows: from − 1 to 9 (staple dishes), from − 8 to 9 (main dishes), from − 8 to 4 (side dishes), from − 2 to 20 (mixed dish of main and side), and 2–26 (mixed dish with staples). The findings clarified the score distribution of dishes in Japan using the dish-version nutrient profile model, reflecting the Japanese dietary pattern. This score distribution, as a multi-factor rating system, may provide useful insights for future research and potential applications in dish-based nutritional evaluation.

BMC Nutrition
Tokyo University of Agriculture (JP), Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences (JP), National Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition (JP)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Nutritional Studies and Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.