Can asynchronous learning modules about generative AI increase students’ knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy for genAI?

The goal of the present large-scale experiment was to test if a 90-minute, open access set of online learning modules with embedded practice and feedback would enhance students’ generative artificial intelligence (genAI) competency. We also examined whether impacts were experienced equitably by all included student demographic groups. Participants were 1,368 undergraduate and graduate students enrolled in 65 course sections. Sections were randomly assigned to treatment (engagement with the learning modules between pre- and post-tests) or control (no learning modules between assessments). Generative AI competency was defined as knowledge, skills, and attitudes and was measured at pre and post. The learning modules significantly improved treatment students’ genAI knowledge, prompt engineering skills, fact- and source-checking skills, and self-efficacy. There was a null effect of the modules on the skill of critically evaluating potential bias in genAI’s output. Improvements in genAI competency were equitable across all student groups (birth at sex, race/ethnicity, student level, first-generation status, and academic discipline). Such readily-available competency trainings are important for supporting the emerging necessity of knowing when and how to work with genAI in one’s education and future career. Limitations, implications, and future directions are discussed. • Created online learning modules to improve students’ genAI competency. • Ran a large experimental study testing the learning modules’ effectiveness. • Measured knowledge, attitudes, and ability to prompt-engineer and interpret output. • Our online learning intervention enhanced students’ genAI competency. • The treatment group experienced equitable learning outcomes across student groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers & Education
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105640
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can asynchronous learning modules about generative AI increase students’ knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy for genAI?

Zachary Mineroff, Michael Melville, Lydia Eckstein Jackson, Marsha C. Lovett et al.
Computers & Education
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Can asynchronous learning modules about generative AI increase students’ knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy for genAI?

Zachary Mineroff, Michael Melville, Lydia Eckstein Jackson, Marsha C. Lovett, Avi Chawla, Judy Brooks, Allison E. Connell Pensky, Chad Hershock, Laura O. Pottmeyer
article en

Abstract

The goal of the present large-scale experiment was to test if a 90-minute, open access set of online learning modules with embedded practice and feedback would enhance students’ generative artificial intelligence (genAI) competency. We also examined whether impacts were experienced equitably by all included student demographic groups. Participants were 1,368 undergraduate and graduate students enrolled in 65 course sections. Sections were randomly assigned to treatment (engagement with the learning modules between pre- and post-tests) or control (no learning modules between assessments). Generative AI competency was defined as knowledge, skills, and attitudes and was measured at pre and post. The learning modules significantly improved treatment students’ genAI knowledge, prompt engineering skills, fact- and source-checking skills, and self-efficacy. There was a null effect of the modules on the skill of critically evaluating potential bias in genAI’s output. Improvements in genAI competency were equitable across all student groups (birth at sex, race/ethnicity, student level, first-generation status, and academic discipline). Such readily-available competency trainings are important for supporting the emerging necessity of knowing when and how to work with genAI in one’s education and future career. Limitations, implications, and future directions are discussed. • Created online learning modules to improve students’ genAI competency. • Ran a large experimental study testing the learning modules’ effectiveness. • Measured knowledge, attitudes, and ability to prompt-engineer and interpret output. • Our online learning intervention enhanced students’ genAI competency. • The treatment group experienced equitable learning outcomes across student groups.

Computers & EducationVol. 250
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Carnegie Mellon University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.