Clinical usefulness of polygenic risk scores in risk prediction models for lung cancer screening and lung nodule management

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer mortality decreases as a result of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, but suffers from low uptake and high false-positive rates. The impact of integrating genetic risk using a polygenic risk score (PRS) to optimize lung cancer screening remains underexplored. METHODS: . Multivariable Cox models, time-dependent area under the curve (AUC), and decision curve analyses (DCA) evaluated association, discrimination, and clinical net benefit. RESULTS: was 1.22. In this context, DCA indicated a modest net benefit for decision thresholds between 10% and 30%. CONCLUSION: PRS in lung cancer reveals context-dependent net benefit across studied populations. Although PRS adds limited value for determining screening eligibility, it may help reclassify borderline individuals and inform decisions regarding closer follow-up or invasive diagnostic procedures for high-risk screened groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Translational Oncology
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2026.102771
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical usefulness of polygenic risk scores in risk prediction models for lung cancer screening and lung nodule management

Sophie Plante, Dominique K. Boudreau, Victoria Saavedra Armero, Zhonglin Li et al.
Translational Oncology
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Clinical usefulness of polygenic risk scores in risk prediction models for lung cancer screening and lung nodule management

Sophie Plante, Dominique K. Boudreau, Victoria Saavedra Armero, Zhonglin Li, Simon Martel, Sabrina Biardel, Sébastien Thériault, Yohan Bossé, Nathalie Gaudreault, Véronique Boumtje, Philippe Joubert, Aida Eslami
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer mortality decreases as a result of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, but suffers from low uptake and high false-positive rates. The impact of integrating genetic risk using a polygenic risk score (PRS) to optimize lung cancer screening remains underexplored. METHODS: . Multivariable Cox models, time-dependent area under the curve (AUC), and decision curve analyses (DCA) evaluated association, discrimination, and clinical net benefit. RESULTS: was 1.22. In this context, DCA indicated a modest net benefit for decision thresholds between 10% and 30%. CONCLUSION: PRS in lung cancer reveals context-dependent net benefit across studied populations. Although PRS adds limited value for determining screening eligibility, it may help reclassify borderline individuals and inform decisions regarding closer follow-up or invasive diagnostic procedures for high-risk screened groups.

Translational OncologyVol. 68
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (CA), Université Laval (CA)
Fondation Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Québec Consortium for Drug Discovery
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.