The Carbon Footprint of a Cesarean Section: A Study on Real‐Time, Prospectively Collected Data of Disposables, Energy, and Reusables

AIM: eq) emissions from disposable products, reusable products, and HVAC energy use. METHODS: eq emissions were estimated using predefined product groups linked to life cycle assessment (LCA) data. HVAC energy use was calculated from procedure time and corresponding LCA data. RESULTS: eq emissions of planned and unplanned (urgency Levels S2 and S3) C-sections were comparable. CONCLUSION: emissions of a C-section are substantial; disposable products were the highest contributors. Emission reduction could be achieved by minimizing unnecessary utilization of disposables, replacing disposables with reusable items, or by reducing the number of C-sections performed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.70286
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Carbon Footprint of a Cesarean Section: A Study on Real‐Time, Prospectively Collected Data of Disposables, Energy, and Reusables

Dorien A. Salentijn, Wouter Hehenkamp, Niek Sperna Weiland, Florine de Haes et al.
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

The Carbon Footprint of a Cesarean Section: A Study on Real‐Time, Prospectively Collected Data of Disposables, Energy, and Reusables

Dorien A. Salentijn, Wouter Hehenkamp, Niek Sperna Weiland, Florine de Haes, Elisabeth Colenbrander
article en

Abstract

AIM: eq) emissions from disposable products, reusable products, and HVAC energy use. METHODS: eq emissions were estimated using predefined product groups linked to life cycle assessment (LCA) data. HVAC energy use was calculated from procedure time and corresponding LCA data. RESULTS: eq emissions of planned and unplanned (urgency Levels S2 and S3) C-sections were comparable. CONCLUSION: emissions of a C-section are substantial; disposable products were the highest contributors. Emission reduction could be achieved by minimizing unnecessary utilization of disposables, replacing disposables with reusable items, or by reducing the number of C-sections performed.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology researchVol. 52(4)
Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Centre for Sustainable Healthcare (GB), GGD Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.