Efficacy Comparison of Open Reduction and Robot‐Aided Infra‐Acetabular and Posterior Column Screws Fixation in Complex Acetabular Fractures Surgery: Union Plate Versus Reconstruction Plate

BACKGROUND: An anatomical supra-pectineal quadrilateral surface buttress plate (Union Plate) has been designed and shown promising mechanical strength in vivo. Robot-aided technique has shown promising results in navigation of infra-acetabular and posterior column screws placement. This study sought to further examine whether the emerging anatomical plate provided advantages over the reconstruction plate in robot-aided complex acetabular fracture surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis comparing two internal fixation methods was conducted between September 2023 and January 2025. Specifically, 23 patients with complex acetabular fractures received robot-aided Union Plate fixation (Union Plate group), while another 20 patients underwent robot-aided reconstruction plate fixation (Reconstruction plate group). Intra-operative plate contouring time, robot-aided manipulation time, the number of channel adjustments per periarticular long screws, total operation time, blood loss, periarticular long screw placement quality, fracture reduction quality, hip joint function, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: With identical robotic assistance, the Union Plate group experienced significantly shorter times for robot-aided manipulation (-12 min), intraoperative plate contouring (-9 min), and total operation (-23 min), along with reduced blood loss (-128 mL) and fewer channel adjustments of the periarticular long screws, compared to the reconstruction plate group. Both groups achieved satisfactory periarticular long screws placement, with a 95.7% perfect rate in the Union Plate group and 90.4% in the reconstruction plate group, showing no significant difference. Neither group experienced iatrogenic neurovascular injuries or screw penetration. There were also no significant differences in postoperative complications, fracture reduction quality, or hip joint function between the groups. CONCLUSION: In surgery for complex acetabular fractures, the Union Plate showed superior operability and safety compared to traditional reconstruction plates. It required less time for robot manipulation, intraoperative plate contouring, and total operation, while also resulting in reduced blood loss and fewer adjustments of the periarticular long screws.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Surgery
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70312
Primary Topic
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy Comparison of Open Reduction and Robot‐Aided Infra‐Acetabular and Posterior Column Screws Fixation in Complex Acetabular Fractures Surgery: Union Plate Versus Reconstruction Plate

Ziming Zhang, Xiaodong Guo, Jianan Chen, Kaifang Chen et al.
Orthopaedic Surgery
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
article

Efficacy Comparison of Open Reduction and Robot‐Aided Infra‐Acetabular and Posterior Column Screws Fixation in Complex Acetabular Fractures Surgery: Union Plate Versus Reconstruction Plate

Ziming Zhang, Xiaodong Guo, Jianan Chen, Kaifang Chen, Yiran Feng, Zhihua Zhao, Runlin Zhu, Lulu Tang, Pengqing Zhang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An anatomical supra-pectineal quadrilateral surface buttress plate (Union Plate) has been designed and shown promising mechanical strength in vivo. Robot-aided technique has shown promising results in navigation of infra-acetabular and posterior column screws placement. This study sought to further examine whether the emerging anatomical plate provided advantages over the reconstruction plate in robot-aided complex acetabular fracture surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis comparing two internal fixation methods was conducted between September 2023 and January 2025. Specifically, 23 patients with complex acetabular fractures received robot-aided Union Plate fixation (Union Plate group), while another 20 patients underwent robot-aided reconstruction plate fixation (Reconstruction plate group). Intra-operative plate contouring time, robot-aided manipulation time, the number of channel adjustments per periarticular long screws, total operation time, blood loss, periarticular long screw placement quality, fracture reduction quality, hip joint function, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: With identical robotic assistance, the Union Plate group experienced significantly shorter times for robot-aided manipulation (-12 min), intraoperative plate contouring (-9 min), and total operation (-23 min), along with reduced blood loss (-128 mL) and fewer channel adjustments of the periarticular long screws, compared to the reconstruction plate group. Both groups achieved satisfactory periarticular long screws placement, with a 95.7% perfect rate in the Union Plate group and 90.4% in the reconstruction plate group, showing no significant difference. Neither group experienced iatrogenic neurovascular injuries or screw penetration. There were also no significant differences in postoperative complications, fracture reduction quality, or hip joint function between the groups. CONCLUSION: In surgery for complex acetabular fractures, the Union Plate showed superior operability and safety compared to traditional reconstruction plates. It required less time for robot manipulation, intraoperative plate contouring, and total operation, while also resulting in reduced blood loss and fewer adjustments of the periarticular long screws.

Orthopaedic SurgeryVol. 18(5)
Central South University (CN), Wuhan University (CN), Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (CN), Wuhan Union Hospital (CN), Stomatology Hospital (CN), Union Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.