Characteristics of effective toothbrushing: results of the 6th German Oral Health Study (DMS • 6).

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to better understand why toothbrushing often fails to achieve the desired state of plaque-free dentition, by systematically analyzing toothbrushing behavior in four age groups (12-year-olds, 20-year-olds, 35- to 44-year-olds, 65- to 74-year-olds). METHOD AND MATERIALS: Analyzable video recordings of toothbrushing, as well as plaque scores assessed immediately after brushing, were available from 1,941 participants of the 6th German Oral Health Study (DMS • 6). All videos were analyzed in terms of tooth contact time (TCT), use of interdental cleaning aids, and type of toothbrush (electric/manual). A more detailed analysis of oral hygiene behavior was conducted in two extreme groups comprising the 10% of adults who showed the lowest (n = 35) vs the highest (n = 33) plaque sores after manual brushing. RESULTS: Only younger seniors (65- to 74-year-olds) showed a mean TCT below 2 minutes. Interdental cleaning was practiced by 25% of the participants, while 44% used electric toothbrushes. The extreme-group comparison revealed significant differences across all observed behavioral aspects, except for correct dental floss use, which no participant was able to master. The use of interdental cleaning aids was associated with a more elaborate toothbrushing behavior. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the critical role of toothbrushing behavior in achieving oral cleanliness. The extent of plaque removal is associated with various aspects of toothbrushing behavior. (Quintessence Int 2026;57(Suppl):S98-S104; doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b6955521).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b6955521
Primary Topic
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characteristics of effective toothbrushing: results of the 6th German Oral Health Study (DMS • 6).

Erika Sitter, Renate Deinzer, Jutta Margraf‐Stiksrud, Kathrin Kuhr et al.
PubMed
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
article

Characteristics of effective toothbrushing: results of the 6th German Oral Health Study (DMS • 6).

Erika Sitter, Renate Deinzer, Jutta Margraf‐Stiksrud, Kathrin Kuhr, Zdenka Eidenhardt, A Rainer Jordan
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to better understand why toothbrushing often fails to achieve the desired state of plaque-free dentition, by systematically analyzing toothbrushing behavior in four age groups (12-year-olds, 20-year-olds, 35- to 44-year-olds, 65- to 74-year-olds). METHOD AND MATERIALS: Analyzable video recordings of toothbrushing, as well as plaque scores assessed immediately after brushing, were available from 1,941 participants of the 6th German Oral Health Study (DMS • 6). All videos were analyzed in terms of tooth contact time (TCT), use of interdental cleaning aids, and type of toothbrush (electric/manual). A more detailed analysis of oral hygiene behavior was conducted in two extreme groups comprising the 10% of adults who showed the lowest (n = 35) vs the highest (n = 33) plaque sores after manual brushing. RESULTS: Only younger seniors (65- to 74-year-olds) showed a mean TCT below 2 minutes. Interdental cleaning was practiced by 25% of the participants, while 44% used electric toothbrushes. The extreme-group comparison revealed significant differences across all observed behavioral aspects, except for correct dental floss use, which no participant was able to master. The use of interdental cleaning aids was associated with a more elaborate toothbrushing behavior. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the critical role of toothbrushing behavior in achieving oral cleanliness. The extent of plaque removal is associated with various aspects of toothbrushing behavior. (Quintessence Int 2026;57(Suppl):S98-S104; doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b6955521).

PubMedVol. 57(11)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.