Feeling bad, learning fast and helping out: how growth mindset shapes construction workers' helping behaviors after mistakes

Purpose Work errors cause operational disruptions and predict distinct behavioral responses among workers. Despite the traditional view of work errors as purely detrimental, limited research has explored their potential to relate to helping behavior, which is critical for mitigating error cascades and maintaining team cohesion in construction settings. This study examines the relationship between work errors and helping behavior among construction workers, the mediating role of self-blame and prosocial motivation and the moderating role of growth mindset. Design/methodology/approach 386 construction workers completed a critical-incident recall task. SPSS, Mplus and the PROCESS macro were used to analyze mediation, moderation and moderated mediation effects. Findings Findings reveal that work errors are positively associated with helping behavior among construction workers. This relationship is mediated by self-blame and prosocial motivation. Moreover, the growth mindset significantly moderates the indirect path from work errors to helping behavior via prosocial motivation, whereas it does not significantly moderate the indirect path via self-blame. Originality/value This study extends error management and safety culture research by shifting the theoretical focus from error prevention to the proactive “error-to-helping” transition. While traditional views frame errors as purely detrimental failures, we apply affective events theory to conceptualize them as catalysts for organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), specifically helping behavior. This research clarifies how work errors are related to dual psychological paths: self-blame and prosocial motivation. Furthermore, because these psychological mechanisms are rooted in the high-stakes, safety-centric nature of the work, the model has high transferability to other similar high-risk industries, such as mining and manufacturing, where individual accountability and mutual support are equally critical for maintaining operational safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-12-2025-2018
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feeling bad, learning fast and helping out: how growth mindset shapes construction workers' helping behaviors after mistakes

Zhaobiao Zong, Shaoqing Su, Hang Xu
Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Feeling bad, learning fast and helping out: how growth mindset shapes construction workers' helping behaviors after mistakes

Zhaobiao Zong, Shaoqing Su, Hang Xu
article en

Abstract

Purpose Work errors cause operational disruptions and predict distinct behavioral responses among workers. Despite the traditional view of work errors as purely detrimental, limited research has explored their potential to relate to helping behavior, which is critical for mitigating error cascades and maintaining team cohesion in construction settings. This study examines the relationship between work errors and helping behavior among construction workers, the mediating role of self-blame and prosocial motivation and the moderating role of growth mindset. Design/methodology/approach 386 construction workers completed a critical-incident recall task. SPSS, Mplus and the PROCESS macro were used to analyze mediation, moderation and moderated mediation effects. Findings Findings reveal that work errors are positively associated with helping behavior among construction workers. This relationship is mediated by self-blame and prosocial motivation. Moreover, the growth mindset significantly moderates the indirect path from work errors to helping behavior via prosocial motivation, whereas it does not significantly moderate the indirect path via self-blame. Originality/value This study extends error management and safety culture research by shifting the theoretical focus from error prevention to the proactive “error-to-helping” transition. While traditional views frame errors as purely detrimental failures, we apply affective events theory to conceptualize them as catalysts for organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), specifically helping behavior. This research clarifies how work errors are related to dual psychological paths: self-blame and prosocial motivation. Furthermore, because these psychological mechanisms are rooted in the high-stakes, safety-centric nature of the work, the model has high transferability to other similar high-risk industries, such as mining and manufacturing, where individual accountability and mutual support are equally critical for maintaining operational safety.

Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
Hefei University of Technology (CN), Huaibei Normal University (CN), Northwest Normal University (CN)
Anhui Office of Philosophy and Social Science
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.