Beyond Informing and Entertaining: Developing and Validating a Scale for Perceived Effects of Watching Science Videos on Social Media

In algorithmically curated environments where science videos reach audiences primarily through incidental exposure rather than active seeking, understanding viewers’ perceived effects provides insights for communicating science effectively. We developed and validated a multidimensional scale measuring perceived effects of watching science videos through three sequential studies. Study 1 used an open-ended survey to generate items ( N = 150), Study 2 employed a close-ended survey for factor identification ( N = 309), and Study 3 tested criterion validity ( N = 286). We identified five dimensions of perceived effects: information acquisition, practical application, enjoyment, time-passing, and social interaction. These dimensions show varied associations with content exposure and perceptions of science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Communication
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470261434537
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Informing and Entertaining: Developing and Validating a Scale for Perceived Effects of Watching Science Videos on Social Media

Shupei Yuan, Luye Bao
Science Communication
Media Influence and Health
article

Beyond Informing and Entertaining: Developing and Validating a Scale for Perceived Effects of Watching Science Videos on Social Media

Shupei Yuan, Luye Bao
article en

Abstract

In algorithmically curated environments where science videos reach audiences primarily through incidental exposure rather than active seeking, understanding viewers’ perceived effects provides insights for communicating science effectively. We developed and validated a multidimensional scale measuring perceived effects of watching science videos through three sequential studies. Study 1 used an open-ended survey to generate items ( N = 150), Study 2 employed a close-ended survey for factor identification ( N = 309), and Study 3 tested criterion validity ( N = 286). We identified five dimensions of perceived effects: information acquisition, practical application, enjoyment, time-passing, and social interaction. These dimensions show varied associations with content exposure and perceptions of science.

Science Communication
Northern Illinois University (US), Peking University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Media Influence and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.