Contralateral hilar irradiation in lung cancer: A systematic review

Management of patients with positive contralateral hilar lymph nodes (LNs) remains controversial. However, whether definitive radiotherapy (RT) can be safely and effectively administered to such patients is unclear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of contralateral hilar irradiation in lung cancer. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE via PubMed from database inception to March 2026. We included articles in which RT was performed for the contralateral or bilateral hilum or that reported radiological assessments of contralateral or bilateral hilar LN metastases. The primary outcome was toxicity associated with contralateral hilar irradiation (including bilateral hilar irradiation), and the key secondary outcome was overall survival (OS). Of 650 articles, 11 met the inclusion criteria. No direct toxicity data associated with contralateral hilar irradiation were available for the primary outcome. Regarding the key secondary outcome, two studies reported OS in patients with positive contralateral hilar LNs who received RT. One study using three-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT) reported no differences in the median survival among the N3 subcategories of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. Another study using 3D-CRT found no differences in survival curves between patients with non-small cell lung cancer with contralateral hilar LNs and those with supraclavicular LNs. No survival data were available for contralateral hilar irradiation using intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) with or without consolidative immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The safety of definitive RT in patients with positive contralateral hilar LNs remains unclear. Further studies are necessary to determine the feasibility of IMRT with chemotherapy, followed by ICIs, under the standards of care. • Systematic review assessed toxicity and efficacy of contralateral hilar irradiation • No direct toxicity data for contralateral hilar irradiation were available • No survival data for contralateral hilar irradiation using IMRT were available • Further studies are needed to assess chemo-IMRT followed by ICIs in these patients

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Lung Cancer
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcan.2026.100027
Primary Topic
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contralateral hilar irradiation in lung cancer: A systematic review

Nobuki Imano, Noriko Kishi, Shigeo Takahashi
International Journal of Lung Cancer
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
article

Contralateral hilar irradiation in lung cancer: A systematic review

Nobuki Imano, Noriko Kishi, Shigeo Takahashi
article en

Abstract

Management of patients with positive contralateral hilar lymph nodes (LNs) remains controversial. However, whether definitive radiotherapy (RT) can be safely and effectively administered to such patients is unclear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of contralateral hilar irradiation in lung cancer. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE via PubMed from database inception to March 2026. We included articles in which RT was performed for the contralateral or bilateral hilum or that reported radiological assessments of contralateral or bilateral hilar LN metastases. The primary outcome was toxicity associated with contralateral hilar irradiation (including bilateral hilar irradiation), and the key secondary outcome was overall survival (OS). Of 650 articles, 11 met the inclusion criteria. No direct toxicity data associated with contralateral hilar irradiation were available for the primary outcome. Regarding the key secondary outcome, two studies reported OS in patients with positive contralateral hilar LNs who received RT. One study using three-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT) reported no differences in the median survival among the N3 subcategories of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. Another study using 3D-CRT found no differences in survival curves between patients with non-small cell lung cancer with contralateral hilar LNs and those with supraclavicular LNs. No survival data were available for contralateral hilar irradiation using intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) with or without consolidative immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The safety of definitive RT in patients with positive contralateral hilar LNs remains unclear. Further studies are necessary to determine the feasibility of IMRT with chemotherapy, followed by ICIs, under the standards of care. • Systematic review assessed toxicity and efficacy of contralateral hilar irradiation • No direct toxicity data for contralateral hilar irradiation were available • No survival data for contralateral hilar irradiation using IMRT were available • Further studies are needed to assess chemo-IMRT followed by ICIs in these patients

International Journal of Lung CancerVol. 1(2)
Kyoto University (JP), Hiroshima University Hospital (JP), Kagawa University Hospital (JP), Kyoto University Hospital (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.