Effects of a peer-support lifestyle intervention on diabetes incidence in India (K-DPP): 9-year follow-up of a cluster-randomised, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the long-term effectiveness of lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention in low-income and middle-income countries is scarce. We aimed to evaluate the 9-year effect of a peer-support lifestyle intervention on the incidence of diabetes in India. METHODS: ] ≥6·5% [48 mmol/mol]). We considered both physician-diagnosed diabetes and individuals who were initiated on antidiabetic medications during the follow-up period in the calculation of diabetes incidence. The primary outcome of the follow-up study was the cumulative incidence of diabetes at 9 years. Long-term effects were assessed using generalised linear models and generalised estimating equations. The trial was registered with the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (updated from the original trial, number ACTRN12611000262909) and the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2021/10/037191), and follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Jan 20 and Oct 27, 2013, 60 polling areas were randomly assigned to the intervention group (n=30) or the control group (n=30). 500 participants were enrolled in the intervention group and 507 were enrolled in the control group. 475 (47%) participants were female and 532 (53%) were male. 863 (86%) participants were followed up at 9 years. The cumulative incidence of diabetes was 125 (30%) of 419 in the intervention group and 142 (34%) of 422 in the control group (relative risk [RR] 0·88 [95% CI 0·73-1·08]; p=0·24). When assessed using FPG criteria alone, the incidence of diabetes was 28% lower in the intervention group than in the control group (RR 0·72 [0·53-0·98]; p=0·036). No significant subgroup differences were observed in terms of age, sex, or baseline glycaemic status. INTERPRETATION: criteria was not statistically significant compared with the control group. The consistency of effects based on incidence of diabetes across subgroups supports the broad preventive potential of community-based, peer-led lifestyle interventions. FUNDING: The Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. TRANSLATION: For the Malayalam translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Lancet Global Health
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(26)00057-4
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of a peer-support lifestyle intervention on diabetes incidence in India (K-DPP): 9-year follow-up of a cluster-randomised, controlled trial

Panniyammakal Jeemon, Edwin B. Fisher, Ajay Mahal, Smitha Jasper et al.
The Lancet Global Health
Diabetes Management and Education
article

Effects of a peer-support lifestyle intervention on diabetes incidence in India (K-DPP): 9-year follow-up of a cluster-randomised, controlled trial

Panniyammakal Jeemon, Edwin B. Fisher, Ajay Mahal, Smitha Jasper, Sivasankaran Sivasubramonian, Robyn J. Tapp, Kavumpurathu Raman Thankappan, Sathish Thirunavukkarasu, Tilahun Haregu, Nitin Kapoor, Pilvikki Absetz, Brian Oldenburg, Lekha Thoniparambil Ravindranathanpillai
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the long-term effectiveness of lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention in low-income and middle-income countries is scarce. We aimed to evaluate the 9-year effect of a peer-support lifestyle intervention on the incidence of diabetes in India. METHODS: ] ≥6·5% [48 mmol/mol]). We considered both physician-diagnosed diabetes and individuals who were initiated on antidiabetic medications during the follow-up period in the calculation of diabetes incidence. The primary outcome of the follow-up study was the cumulative incidence of diabetes at 9 years. Long-term effects were assessed using generalised linear models and generalised estimating equations. The trial was registered with the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (updated from the original trial, number ACTRN12611000262909) and the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2021/10/037191), and follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Jan 20 and Oct 27, 2013, 60 polling areas were randomly assigned to the intervention group (n=30) or the control group (n=30). 500 participants were enrolled in the intervention group and 507 were enrolled in the control group. 475 (47%) participants were female and 532 (53%) were male. 863 (86%) participants were followed up at 9 years. The cumulative incidence of diabetes was 125 (30%) of 419 in the intervention group and 142 (34%) of 422 in the control group (relative risk [RR] 0·88 [95% CI 0·73-1·08]; p=0·24). When assessed using FPG criteria alone, the incidence of diabetes was 28% lower in the intervention group than in the control group (RR 0·72 [0·53-0·98]; p=0·036). No significant subgroup differences were observed in terms of age, sex, or baseline glycaemic status. INTERPRETATION: criteria was not statistically significant compared with the control group. The consistency of effects based on incidence of diabetes across subgroups supports the broad preventive potential of community-based, peer-led lifestyle interventions. FUNDING: The Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. TRANSLATION: For the Malayalam translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

The Lancet Global Health
Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre (IN), Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Tampere University (FI), Christian Medical College, Vellore (IN), Sree Chitra Thirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology (IN), Madras Diabetes Research Foundation (IN), Melbourne Health (AU), Coventry University (GB)
The Wellcome Trust DBT India Alliance, National Health and Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Diabetes Management and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.