Primary care stakeholder perspectives on clinical implementation of patient-reported hereditary cancer risk-assessment

Most individuals at increased risk of hereditary cancers are unaware of their risk status, in part due to the suboptimal implementation of evidence-based hereditary cancer screening in primary care. Identifying contextual determinants of implementation is necessary to facilitate implementation and subsequent cancer prevention. To inform these efforts, we assessed implementation determinants and needs across diverse primary care clinics. Between December 2023 and December 2024, we conducted qualitative interviews with primary care stakeholders identified through public databases and snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews explored factors necessary to implement an evidence-based intervention: a patient‑reported family history screening tool for hereditary cancer risk assessment. We used content analysis to characterize implementation determinants according to the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research. Nineteen stakeholders from physician offices (n = 9), outpatient clinics (n = 7) and community health centers (n = 3) completed qualitative interviews. Stakeholders viewed the intervention as feasible to implement and highlighted non-clinician-led workflows and electronic medical record integration as key facilitators. Outer setting factors such as inconsistent insurance coverage, variable patient out of pocket costs for genetic testing, and the need to align care delivery with national guidelines were key considerations. Inner setting barriers to implementation included resource constraints, competing medical priorities, and potentially low survey completion rates. Clinic leaders and primary care providers reported variable experience with cancer genetic testing, but many expressed interest and capacity to implement the intervention. Stakeholders endorsed interest and willingness to implement a patient-reported family history screening, but identified important outer and inner setting barriers that must be addressed for effective implementation. Integrating decision support tools, improving education efforts, and engaging payors to standardize recommended guidelines may improve genetic testing access for patients at-risk for hereditary cancers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Primary Care
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-026-03285-7
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Primary care stakeholder perspectives on clinical implementation of patient-reported hereditary cancer risk-assessment

Cathy Day, Nora Gimpel, Sara Pirzadeh‐Miller, Sukh Makhnoon et al.
BMC Primary Care
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Primary care stakeholder perspectives on clinical implementation of patient-reported hereditary cancer risk-assessment

Cathy Day, Nora Gimpel, Sara Pirzadeh‐Miller, Sukh Makhnoon, Anoop Gurram, Tiwatope Ibidapo, Sofia Bereket
article en

Abstract

Most individuals at increased risk of hereditary cancers are unaware of their risk status, in part due to the suboptimal implementation of evidence-based hereditary cancer screening in primary care. Identifying contextual determinants of implementation is necessary to facilitate implementation and subsequent cancer prevention. To inform these efforts, we assessed implementation determinants and needs across diverse primary care clinics. Between December 2023 and December 2024, we conducted qualitative interviews with primary care stakeholders identified through public databases and snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews explored factors necessary to implement an evidence-based intervention: a patient‑reported family history screening tool for hereditary cancer risk assessment. We used content analysis to characterize implementation determinants according to the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research. Nineteen stakeholders from physician offices (n = 9), outpatient clinics (n = 7) and community health centers (n = 3) completed qualitative interviews. Stakeholders viewed the intervention as feasible to implement and highlighted non-clinician-led workflows and electronic medical record integration as key facilitators. Outer setting factors such as inconsistent insurance coverage, variable patient out of pocket costs for genetic testing, and the need to align care delivery with national guidelines were key considerations. Inner setting barriers to implementation included resource constraints, competing medical priorities, and potentially low survey completion rates. Clinic leaders and primary care providers reported variable experience with cancer genetic testing, but many expressed interest and capacity to implement the intervention. Stakeholders endorsed interest and willingness to implement a patient-reported family history screening, but identified important outer and inner setting barriers that must be addressed for effective implementation. Integrating decision support tools, improving education efforts, and engaging payors to standardize recommended guidelines may improve genetic testing access for patients at-risk for hereditary cancers.

BMC Primary Care
Southwestern Medical Center (US), Texas Medical Association (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.