Socioeconomic inequalities in mental health and well-being among higher education staff during COVID-19: the role of policymakers and psychological needs / <i>Desigualdades socioeconómicas en la salud mental y el bienestar del personal de educación s

Higher education (HE) staff experience some of the poorest mental health and well-being across occupational groups, with particularly low levels reported among staff from lower socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds. Combining Needs Theory and Ecological Systems Theory, we investigate how perceptions of policymakers may have contributed to mental health inequalities among HE workers in the United Kingdom (UK) during the COVID-19 pandemic. A survey of UK HE staff ( n = 1,116) from 92 universities during a ‘stay at home’ order found that lower subjective SES was linked to poorer mental health and well-being, and to the perception that policymakers were disconnected (perceived inclusion) and did not value (perceived worth) university staff. A structural equation model indicated that these perceptions of policymakers mediated the relationship between subjective SES and mental health and well-being. Greater perceived control by policymakers was also associated with poorer mental health and well-being, though unexpectedly, this effect was not linked to subjective SES. These findings suggest that perceptions of policymakers may worsen socioeconomic inequalities in mental health and well-being through unmet psychological needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02134748261429464
Primary Topic
Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socioeconomic inequalities in mental health and well-being among higher education staff during COVID-19: the role of policymakers and psychological needs / Desigualdades socioeconómicas en la salud mental y el bienestar del personal de educación s

Isla Dougall, Milica Vasiljevic, Maja Kutlaca, Mario Weick
International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social
Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
article

Socioeconomic inequalities in mental health and well-being among higher education staff during COVID-19: the role of policymakers and psychological needs / Desigualdades socioeconómicas en la salud mental y el bienestar del personal de educación s

Isla Dougall, Milica Vasiljevic, Maja Kutlaca, Mario Weick
article en

Abstract

Higher education (HE) staff experience some of the poorest mental health and well-being across occupational groups, with particularly low levels reported among staff from lower socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds. Combining Needs Theory and Ecological Systems Theory, we investigate how perceptions of policymakers may have contributed to mental health inequalities among HE workers in the United Kingdom (UK) during the COVID-19 pandemic. A survey of UK HE staff ( n = 1,116) from 92 universities during a ‘stay at home’ order found that lower subjective SES was linked to poorer mental health and well-being, and to the perception that policymakers were disconnected (perceived inclusion) and did not value (perceived worth) university staff. A structural equation model indicated that these perceptions of policymakers mediated the relationship between subjective SES and mental health and well-being. Greater perceived control by policymakers was also associated with poorer mental health and well-being, though unexpectedly, this effect was not linked to subjective SES. These findings suggest that perceptions of policymakers may worsen socioeconomic inequalities in mental health and well-being through unmet psychological needs.

International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología SocialVol. 41(2)
Durham University (GB)
Durham University
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.