French physical activity perception questionnaire for chronic low back pain: development and preliminary validation

BACKGROUND: Non-pharmacological interventions targeting physical activity (PA) are recommended for managing chronic low back pain (CLBP) as they reduce pain, disability, and recurrence while improving functional outcomes. However, their success depends on adherence to PA, which many people struggle to maintain. Assessing PA perceptions may help address these challenges, yet no validated tool is currently available. AIM: This study aimed to develop the French Assessment of Physical Activity Perception in CLBP individuals (APAP-CLBP) and to provide a preliminary evaluation of its psychometric properties. Secondary objectives were to explore the associations between APAP-CLBP scores and clinical characteristics of individuals with CLBP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A 26-item questionnaire was developed based on a qualitative study identifying PA barriers and facilitators in CLBP. The APAP-CLBP questionnaire was completed by 97 participants with CLBP, included during a medical consultation or on the first day of a 3-week lumbar rehabilitation program. Psychometric analyses included acceptability, construct validity, internal consistency, convergent validity, test-retest reliability, and sensitivity to change. RESULTS: Principal factor analysis identified 3 subscales that demonstrated good internal consistency: 'Constraints' (5 items, Cronbach's alpha 0.75), 'Barriers' (5 items, Cronbach's alpha 0.73), and 'Pain' (3 items, Cronbach's alpha 0.80). Test-retest reliability, constrained by a small subsample size (n = 22), was substantial for 'Constraints' (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC=0.66), 'Barriers' (ICC=0.69), and 'Pain' (ICC=0.75) subscales. Only the 'Barriers' subscale showed an exploratory trend toward sensitivity to change. CONCLUSION: The French APAP-CLBP is the first questionnaire assessing PA perceptions in CLBP. While preliminary findings support a concise 13-item, 3-factor structure focused on barriers to PA, psychometric properties are not yet sufficient for clinical implementation of the APAP-CLBP. Further validation in larger samples using the original 26-item version is required to confirm these results and explore additional factors, such as facilitators of PA or motivation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT05942196.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2026.102113
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

French physical activity perception questionnaire for chronic low back pain: development and preliminary validation

Candy Guiguet‐Auclair, Emmanuel Coudeyre, Charlotte Lanhers, Mathilde Pelletier Visa et al.
Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

French physical activity perception questionnaire for chronic low back pain: development and preliminary validation

Candy Guiguet‐Auclair, Emmanuel Coudeyre, Charlotte Lanhers, Mathilde Pelletier Visa, Julie Ducret, Inès Monborne
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-pharmacological interventions targeting physical activity (PA) are recommended for managing chronic low back pain (CLBP) as they reduce pain, disability, and recurrence while improving functional outcomes. However, their success depends on adherence to PA, which many people struggle to maintain. Assessing PA perceptions may help address these challenges, yet no validated tool is currently available. AIM: This study aimed to develop the French Assessment of Physical Activity Perception in CLBP individuals (APAP-CLBP) and to provide a preliminary evaluation of its psychometric properties. Secondary objectives were to explore the associations between APAP-CLBP scores and clinical characteristics of individuals with CLBP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A 26-item questionnaire was developed based on a qualitative study identifying PA barriers and facilitators in CLBP. The APAP-CLBP questionnaire was completed by 97 participants with CLBP, included during a medical consultation or on the first day of a 3-week lumbar rehabilitation program. Psychometric analyses included acceptability, construct validity, internal consistency, convergent validity, test-retest reliability, and sensitivity to change. RESULTS: Principal factor analysis identified 3 subscales that demonstrated good internal consistency: 'Constraints' (5 items, Cronbach's alpha 0.75), 'Barriers' (5 items, Cronbach's alpha 0.73), and 'Pain' (3 items, Cronbach's alpha 0.80). Test-retest reliability, constrained by a small subsample size (n = 22), was substantial for 'Constraints' (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC=0.66), 'Barriers' (ICC=0.69), and 'Pain' (ICC=0.75) subscales. Only the 'Barriers' subscale showed an exploratory trend toward sensitivity to change. CONCLUSION: The French APAP-CLBP is the first questionnaire assessing PA perceptions in CLBP. While preliminary findings support a concise 13-item, 3-factor structure focused on barriers to PA, psychometric properties are not yet sufficient for clinical implementation of the APAP-CLBP. Further validation in larger samples using the original 26-item version is required to confirm these results and explore additional factors, such as facilitators of PA or motivation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT05942196.

Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation MedicineVol. 69(5)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Saint Louis University Hospital (US), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), University of Clermont Auvergne (FR), Sigma Clermont (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand (FR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.