Comparison of the Efficacy of Q‐Switched Versus Long‐Pulsed Fractional 1064 nm Nd:YAG Laser in the Treatment of Active Facial Acne: A Pilot, Double‐Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Split‐Face Study

Background and Aims: There are different treatment options for acne including topicals, systemic, hormonal, intralesional, and laser treatments. Fractional Nd: YAG 1064 nm laser has been used to treat acne scars and there are also reports on its use in active acne. In this pilot, split-face, randomized trial conducted as an adjunct to standard care, the aim was to compare effects of long-pulse (LP) with Quality-switched (QS) Nd:YAG laser on active acne. Methods: This is a double-blind, randomized, controlled, split-face study comparing LP versus QS Nd: YAG laser for treating active acne in 20 participants (age range, 18-50 years). Patients had 3 sessions of treatment with 3-week intervals, with a final follow-up 4 weeks later. Assessments were performed using the modified Leeds revised acne grading system, physician global assessment and patient global satisfaction. All participants received daily oral azithromycin as standardized background therapy; lasers were evaluated as adjunctive treatments. Results: = 0.001). Conclusion: As adjuncts to daily azithromycin, both LP and QS 1064 nm Nd:YAG lasers showed reductions in acne severity; QS demonstrated a modest within-subject advantage. Given the small sample and adjunctive systemic therapy, findings are preliminary and hypothesis-generating.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Science Reports
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.72354
Primary Topic
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Efficacy of Q‐Switched Versus Long‐Pulsed Fractional 1064 nm Nd:YAG Laser in the Treatment of Active Facial Acne: A Pilot, Double‐Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Split‐Face Study

Afsaneh Sadeghzadeh‐Bazargan, Mohammadreza Ghassemi, Alireza Jafarzadeh, Azadeh Goodarzi et al.
Health Science Reports
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
article

Comparison of the Efficacy of Q‐Switched Versus Long‐Pulsed Fractional 1064 nm Nd:YAG Laser in the Treatment of Active Facial Acne: A Pilot, Double‐Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Split‐Face Study

Afsaneh Sadeghzadeh‐Bazargan, Mohammadreza Ghassemi, Alireza Jafarzadeh, Azadeh Goodarzi, Dorian Maghsoodloo
article en

Abstract

Background and Aims: There are different treatment options for acne including topicals, systemic, hormonal, intralesional, and laser treatments. Fractional Nd: YAG 1064 nm laser has been used to treat acne scars and there are also reports on its use in active acne. In this pilot, split-face, randomized trial conducted as an adjunct to standard care, the aim was to compare effects of long-pulse (LP) with Quality-switched (QS) Nd:YAG laser on active acne. Methods: This is a double-blind, randomized, controlled, split-face study comparing LP versus QS Nd: YAG laser for treating active acne in 20 participants (age range, 18-50 years). Patients had 3 sessions of treatment with 3-week intervals, with a final follow-up 4 weeks later. Assessments were performed using the modified Leeds revised acne grading system, physician global assessment and patient global satisfaction. All participants received daily oral azithromycin as standardized background therapy; lasers were evaluated as adjunctive treatments. Results: = 0.001). Conclusion: As adjuncts to daily azithromycin, both LP and QS 1064 nm Nd:YAG lasers showed reductions in acne severity; QS demonstrated a modest within-subject advantage. Given the small sample and adjunctive systemic therapy, findings are preliminary and hypothesis-generating.

Health Science ReportsVol. 9(4)
Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.