Computational and Memory Efficiency in Heartbeat Rate Detection: A Review of ECG and PPG Techniques

(1) Background: Heartbeat detection from electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmograph (PPG) signals is widely used in wearable devices for health monitoring, fitness tracking, and stress assessment. While numerous methods have been proposed, their practical suitability depends not only on accuracy but also on computational and memory constraints inherent to resource-limited systems. (2) Methods: A scoping review of 52 studies published between 2017 and 2024 was conducted, covering time-domain, frequency-domain, matrix-based, and machine learning approaches. The methods were evaluated according to estimation accuracy, computational complexity, memory footprint, and suitability for on-device implementation. (3) Results: Time-domain peak detection methods consistently provide high accuracy (minimum of 79.25%, maximum of 99.96%, and median ≥99.69%) for ECG and reliable heart rate estimation for PPG with linear computational complexity, low memory requirements and low energy consumption. Frequency-domain approaches are suitable for average heart rate estimation from PPG but do not preserve inter-beat intervals (error range of [1.07, 6.4] beats per minute (BPM)). Matrix-based and machine learning methods often entail higher computational cost without proportional performance gains in wearable contexts (error range of [1.07, 6.4] BPM for PPG signals; accuracy in range of [95.4, 99.96]% for ECG). (4) Conclusions: Lightweight signal-processing techniques offer the most favorable trade-off between accuracy and efficiency for wearable implementations, whereas computationally intensive approaches are better suited for edge- or cloud-based processing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26082409
Primary Topic
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computational and Memory Efficiency in Heartbeat Rate Detection: A Review of ECG and PPG Techniques

Clara Lebrato-Vázquez, Juan A. Castro-García, Gemma Sánchez-Antón, Manuel Merino-Monge et al.
Sensors
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
article

Computational and Memory Efficiency in Heartbeat Rate Detection: A Review of ECG and PPG Techniques

Clara Lebrato-Vázquez, Juan A. Castro-García, Gemma Sánchez-Antón, Manuel Merino-Monge, Alberto Jesús Molina-Cantero
article en

Abstract

(1) Background: Heartbeat detection from electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmograph (PPG) signals is widely used in wearable devices for health monitoring, fitness tracking, and stress assessment. While numerous methods have been proposed, their practical suitability depends not only on accuracy but also on computational and memory constraints inherent to resource-limited systems. (2) Methods: A scoping review of 52 studies published between 2017 and 2024 was conducted, covering time-domain, frequency-domain, matrix-based, and machine learning approaches. The methods were evaluated according to estimation accuracy, computational complexity, memory footprint, and suitability for on-device implementation. (3) Results: Time-domain peak detection methods consistently provide high accuracy (minimum of 79.25%, maximum of 99.96%, and median ≥99.69%) for ECG and reliable heart rate estimation for PPG with linear computational complexity, low memory requirements and low energy consumption. Frequency-domain approaches are suitable for average heart rate estimation from PPG but do not preserve inter-beat intervals (error range of [1.07, 6.4] beats per minute (BPM)). Matrix-based and machine learning methods often entail higher computational cost without proportional performance gains in wearable contexts (error range of [1.07, 6.4] BPM for PPG signals; accuracy in range of [95.4, 99.96]% for ECG). (4) Conclusions: Lightweight signal-processing techniques offer the most favorable trade-off between accuracy and efficiency for wearable implementations, whereas computationally intensive approaches are better suited for edge- or cloud-based processing.

SensorsVol. 26(8)
Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Universidad de Sevilla
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.