Improving the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Experience: How Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Parameters and Coil Design Affect Somatosensory Sensations

OBJECTIVES: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) often elicits scalp sensations and muscle twitches. These sensory side effects can confound research outcomes and cause discomfort in clinical use, yet they remain poorly characterized. The goal of this study is to systematically characterize TMS-induced sensations and investigate (1) the effects of key TMS parameters (intensity, location, protocol, coil type), (2) whether a novel coil design reduces unpleasant sensations, and (3) whether an advanced sham coil can effectively mimic the sensory profile of active TMS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 48 participants participated in two experiments. Scalp sensations were rated using a ten-dimensional questionnaire across stimulation sites (F3, Cz, P4), intensities (80%, 100%, and 120% of resting motor threshold), and protocols (1 Hz, 10 Hz, and intermittent theta burst stimulation), using different coil types (experiment I: novel vs overlapping; experiment II: novel vs standard vs sham). RESULTS: Scalp sensations were systematically influenced by stimulation intensity, position, and protocol, with consistent main effects across nearly all sensory dimensions and various interactions shedding light on the complex interplay of TMS parameters. Coil type significantly shaped the sensory profile: The novel coil reduced muscle twitches compared with the standard coil, and the sham coil closely replicated the sensory experience of active stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive characterization of TMS-induced sensations and highlights the significant effects of the TMS parameters and their interplay on scalp sensations. Novel coil designs offer promising options to reduce discomfort and improve sensory blinding, thereby minimizing confounding effects in both experimental and clinical TMS applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2026.02.008
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Experience: How Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Parameters and Coil Design Affect Somatosensory Sensations

Felix Duecker, Alexander T. Sack, Alexander Lemberg, Xenia Gurjanov et al.
Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Improving the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Experience: How Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Parameters and Coil Design Affect Somatosensory Sensations

Felix Duecker, Alexander T. Sack, Alexander Lemberg, Xenia Gurjanov, Zhen Li, Palina Sinitsa
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) often elicits scalp sensations and muscle twitches. These sensory side effects can confound research outcomes and cause discomfort in clinical use, yet they remain poorly characterized. The goal of this study is to systematically characterize TMS-induced sensations and investigate (1) the effects of key TMS parameters (intensity, location, protocol, coil type), (2) whether a novel coil design reduces unpleasant sensations, and (3) whether an advanced sham coil can effectively mimic the sensory profile of active TMS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 48 participants participated in two experiments. Scalp sensations were rated using a ten-dimensional questionnaire across stimulation sites (F3, Cz, P4), intensities (80%, 100%, and 120% of resting motor threshold), and protocols (1 Hz, 10 Hz, and intermittent theta burst stimulation), using different coil types (experiment I: novel vs overlapping; experiment II: novel vs standard vs sham). RESULTS: Scalp sensations were systematically influenced by stimulation intensity, position, and protocol, with consistent main effects across nearly all sensory dimensions and various interactions shedding light on the complex interplay of TMS parameters. Coil type significantly shaped the sensory profile: The novel coil reduced muscle twitches compared with the standard coil, and the sham coil closely replicated the sensory experience of active stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive characterization of TMS-induced sensations and highlights the significant effects of the TMS parameters and their interplay on scalp sensations. Novel coil designs offer promising options to reduce discomfort and improve sensory blinding, thereby minimizing confounding effects in both experimental and clinical TMS applications.

Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface
Maastricht University (NL)
China Scholarship Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.