One Health in the public mind: Narrative constructions of zoonotic spillovers
= 1549, after data cleaning), we coded open-ended responses about problem definitions, heroes, and solutions, and analyzed results with Poisson generalized linear modeling of counts. A small portion of respondents (14%) articulated a full OH problem definition; the majority (75%) emphasized human dimensions, while just 11% highlighted environmental or animal aspects. Respondents using a OH definition were more likely to identify diverse heroes spanning human, environmental, and animal organizations, and to propose environmental solutions compared with those using human-centered definitions. Evidence of congruence between problem definitions and solutions emerged, with OH problem definitions associated with a multisectoral array of heroes. Overall, public conceptions of zoonotic spillovers remain fragmented, reflecting limited uptake of integrative OH perspectives. Strengthening public understanding of OH and fostering coherent, systems-based narratives are essential for enhancing policy legitimacy and advancing preventive, cross-sectoral approaches to OH issues more broadly.
Authors
- Elizabeth A. Shanahan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1074-5570)
- Xin Han
- Sarah Salam
- Savanna Washburn
- Sally K. Slipher
Institutions
- Montana State University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- One Health
- Published
- 2026-04-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2026.101411
- Primary Topic
- Zoonotic diseases and public health
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences