One Health in the public mind: Narrative constructions of zoonotic spillovers

= 1549, after data cleaning), we coded open-ended responses about problem definitions, heroes, and solutions, and analyzed results with Poisson generalized linear modeling of counts. A small portion of respondents (14%) articulated a full OH problem definition; the majority (75%) emphasized human dimensions, while just 11% highlighted environmental or animal aspects. Respondents using a OH definition were more likely to identify diverse heroes spanning human, environmental, and animal organizations, and to propose environmental solutions compared with those using human-centered definitions. Evidence of congruence between problem definitions and solutions emerged, with OH problem definitions associated with a multisectoral array of heroes. Overall, public conceptions of zoonotic spillovers remain fragmented, reflecting limited uptake of integrative OH perspectives. Strengthening public understanding of OH and fostering coherent, systems-based narratives are essential for enhancing policy legitimacy and advancing preventive, cross-sectoral approaches to OH issues more broadly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
One Health
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2026.101411
Primary Topic
Zoonotic diseases and public health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One Health in the public mind: Narrative constructions of zoonotic spillovers

Elizabeth A. Shanahan, Xin Han, Sarah Salam, Savanna Washburn et al.
One Health
Zoonotic diseases and public health
article

One Health in the public mind: Narrative constructions of zoonotic spillovers

Elizabeth A. Shanahan, Xin Han, Sarah Salam, Savanna Washburn, Sally K. Slipher
article en

Abstract

= 1549, after data cleaning), we coded open-ended responses about problem definitions, heroes, and solutions, and analyzed results with Poisson generalized linear modeling of counts. A small portion of respondents (14%) articulated a full OH problem definition; the majority (75%) emphasized human dimensions, while just 11% highlighted environmental or animal aspects. Respondents using a OH definition were more likely to identify diverse heroes spanning human, environmental, and animal organizations, and to propose environmental solutions compared with those using human-centered definitions. Evidence of congruence between problem definitions and solutions emerged, with OH problem definitions associated with a multisectoral array of heroes. Overall, public conceptions of zoonotic spillovers remain fragmented, reflecting limited uptake of integrative OH perspectives. Strengthening public understanding of OH and fostering coherent, systems-based narratives are essential for enhancing policy legitimacy and advancing preventive, cross-sectoral approaches to OH issues more broadly.

One HealthVol. 22
Montana State University (US)
National Science Foundation, National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Zoonotic diseases and public health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

One Health in the public mind: Narrative constructions of zoonotic spillovers — Elizabeth A. Shanahan, Xin Han, et al. · One Health (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS