Still Worth It? Who Is Satisfied After Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery Despite Not Achieving the Minimum Clinically Important Difference?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although spine surgeons may intuitively presume that clinical improvement drives patient satisfaction, some patients remain satisfied despite limited clinical improvement. Therefore, in patients undergoing degenerative lumbar spine surgery who did not achieve minimum clinically important difference (MCID), we sought to identify predictors of long-term postoperative satisfaction. METHODS: A prospective, single-institution registry (2010-2023) was retrospectively queried to identify patients undergoing elective, degenerative lumbar spine surgery who did not achieve MCID at 12 months, defined as <30% improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index or Visual Analog Scale pain scores from baseline. Primary outcome was 12-month postoperative satisfaction, assessed using the North American Spine Society questionnaire. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of satisfaction in the absence of MCID, both overall and stratified by procedure type. RESULTS: Among 3547 patients, 611 (17.2%) did not achieve MCID for disability or pain, of whom 334 (54.7%) remained satisfied. Older age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.04, P = .035) and private insurance (OR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.03-2.57, P = .035) independently increased the odds of satisfaction. Specifically, each additional decade of age conferred a 22% higher odds of 12-month satisfaction. Fusion: Among 2133 fusion patients, 390 (18.3%) did not achieve MCID, of whom 219 (56.2%) still reported satisfaction. Older age again increased odds of satisfaction (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.00-1.09, P = .036), whereas baseline independent ambulation decreased odds (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.08-0.58, P = .002). Decompression: Among 1386 decompression patients, those with a diagnosis of stenosis were three-times more likely to report satisfaction than those with other primary diagnoses (OR: 3.04, 95% CI: 1.06-8.72, P = .039). CONCLUSION: More than half of patients who did not achieve MCID still felt surgery was worthwhile, suggesting that long-term satisfaction is shaped by broader patient expectations and sociodemographic context. To optimize patients' perceived benefit of surgery, surgeons should engage in individualized counseling to understand patients' priorities and expectations, rather than selecting interventions based solely on their potential to maximize symptom relief.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000004040
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Still Worth It? Who Is Satisfied After Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery Despite Not Achieving the Minimum Clinically Important Difference?

Bayard R. Wilson, Scott L. Zuckerman, Advith Sarikonda, Emma Ye et al.
Neurosurgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Still Worth It? Who Is Satisfied After Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery Despite Not Achieving the Minimum Clinically Important Difference?

Bayard R. Wilson, Scott L. Zuckerman, Advith Sarikonda, Emma Ye, Amir M. Abtahi, Harsh Jain, Byron F. Stephens, Hani Chanbour
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although spine surgeons may intuitively presume that clinical improvement drives patient satisfaction, some patients remain satisfied despite limited clinical improvement. Therefore, in patients undergoing degenerative lumbar spine surgery who did not achieve minimum clinically important difference (MCID), we sought to identify predictors of long-term postoperative satisfaction. METHODS: A prospective, single-institution registry (2010-2023) was retrospectively queried to identify patients undergoing elective, degenerative lumbar spine surgery who did not achieve MCID at 12 months, defined as <30% improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index or Visual Analog Scale pain scores from baseline. Primary outcome was 12-month postoperative satisfaction, assessed using the North American Spine Society questionnaire. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of satisfaction in the absence of MCID, both overall and stratified by procedure type. RESULTS: Among 3547 patients, 611 (17.2%) did not achieve MCID for disability or pain, of whom 334 (54.7%) remained satisfied. Older age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.04, P = .035) and private insurance (OR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.03-2.57, P = .035) independently increased the odds of satisfaction. Specifically, each additional decade of age conferred a 22% higher odds of 12-month satisfaction. Fusion: Among 2133 fusion patients, 390 (18.3%) did not achieve MCID, of whom 219 (56.2%) still reported satisfaction. Older age again increased odds of satisfaction (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.00-1.09, P = .036), whereas baseline independent ambulation decreased odds (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.08-0.58, P = .002). Decompression: Among 1386 decompression patients, those with a diagnosis of stenosis were three-times more likely to report satisfaction than those with other primary diagnoses (OR: 3.04, 95% CI: 1.06-8.72, P = .039). CONCLUSION: More than half of patients who did not achieve MCID still felt surgery was worthwhile, suggesting that long-term satisfaction is shaped by broader patient expectations and sociodemographic context. To optimize patients' perceived benefit of surgery, surgeons should engage in individualized counseling to understand patients' priorities and expectations, rather than selecting interventions based solely on their potential to maximize symptom relief.

Neurosurgery
Vanderbilt University (US), Neurological Surgery (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.