Policy Controversies Over AI Applications in Higher Education Within the Framework of Sustainable Development Goal 4

The originality of this paper lies in addressing a gap in research concerning the growing use of AI in higher education (HE) and the lack of sector-specific policies. AI policy in HE is an emerging area with limited scholarship, yet existing studies warrant systematic synthesis. Using a PRISMA-informed systematic review approach, the study screened peer-reviewed English-language journal articles published between 2015 and early 2025; 11 studies met the inclusion criteria, indicating a limited evidence base on AI policy in higher education. The small final corpus indicates that peer-reviewed research on AI policy in higher education remains emergent. This paper advances theoretical understanding of the pace of policy learning, the actors involved, and persisting gaps. It also consolidates available policy recommendations, notes their limitations, and underscores the need for collective action to accelerate effective AI policy responses across HE. In doing so, it informs policy-making and supports efforts to align institutional responses to AI with SDG4 on inclusive and equitable quality education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083885
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy Controversies Over AI Applications in Higher Education Within the Framework of Sustainable Development Goal 4

Iryna Kushnir, Marcellus Forh Mbah
Sustainability
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Policy Controversies Over AI Applications in Higher Education Within the Framework of Sustainable Development Goal 4

Iryna Kushnir, Marcellus Forh Mbah
article en

Abstract

The originality of this paper lies in addressing a gap in research concerning the growing use of AI in higher education (HE) and the lack of sector-specific policies. AI policy in HE is an emerging area with limited scholarship, yet existing studies warrant systematic synthesis. Using a PRISMA-informed systematic review approach, the study screened peer-reviewed English-language journal articles published between 2015 and early 2025; 11 studies met the inclusion criteria, indicating a limited evidence base on AI policy in higher education. The small final corpus indicates that peer-reviewed research on AI policy in higher education remains emergent. This paper advances theoretical understanding of the pace of policy learning, the actors involved, and persisting gaps. It also consolidates available policy recommendations, notes their limitations, and underscores the need for collective action to accelerate effective AI policy responses across HE. In doing so, it informs policy-making and supports efforts to align institutional responses to AI with SDG4 on inclusive and equitable quality education.

SustainabilityVol. 18(8)
University of Manchester (GB), Space Research Institute (UA), Nottingham Trent University (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.