qCON and qNOX-Guided Sedation Monitoring During Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Prospective Observational Preliminary Study

Background: The depth of sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy is predominantly assessed based on clinical experience due to the absence of a universally recognized objective standard. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of two novel electroencephalography-derived parameters, the quantitative consciousness index (qCON) and the quantitative nociception index (qNOX), for sedation and analgesia monitoring, and to determine the optimal qCON range correlated with optimal procedural stability. Methods: In this prospective observational study, a total of 220 patients scheduled for elective gastroscopy or colonoscopy were enrolled. All patients received propofol and sufentanil for sedation and analgesia according to routine clinical practice. Depth of anesthesia and nociceptive responses were continuously monitored using qCON and qNOX. Hemodynamic parameters, body movement, and coughing were recorded at predefined time points. The primary outcome was defined as optimal procedural stability, characterized by hemodynamic fluctuations within 10% of baseline combined with the absence of body movement or coughing. Results: = 0.716; p < 0.001). The qNOX index demonstrated a more rapid response to noxious stimuli than qCON during recovery phases. Conclusion: The qCON index appears to provide an objective approach to assessing sedation depth in sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy. Our findings suggest that qCON values within the range of 55 to 63 are associated with optimal procedural stability as defined in this study. Combined monitoring with qCON and qNOX may provide complementary information to support a balanced approach to intra-procedural sedation management, thereby potentially enhancing the safety and overall quality of sedation management. Trial Registration: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Registration Number: NCT06604156) on April 11, 2024.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.s593667
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

qCON and qNOX-Guided Sedation Monitoring During Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Prospective Observational Preliminary Study

Xiaoge Han, 程雯婕, Su Min, Xuanqi Yang et al.
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

qCON and qNOX-Guided Sedation Monitoring During Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Prospective Observational Preliminary Study

Xiaoge Han, 程雯婕, Su Min, Xuanqi Yang, Dayuan Wei, Qin Liu
article en

Abstract

Background: The depth of sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy is predominantly assessed based on clinical experience due to the absence of a universally recognized objective standard. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of two novel electroencephalography-derived parameters, the quantitative consciousness index (qCON) and the quantitative nociception index (qNOX), for sedation and analgesia monitoring, and to determine the optimal qCON range correlated with optimal procedural stability. Methods: In this prospective observational study, a total of 220 patients scheduled for elective gastroscopy or colonoscopy were enrolled. All patients received propofol and sufentanil for sedation and analgesia according to routine clinical practice. Depth of anesthesia and nociceptive responses were continuously monitored using qCON and qNOX. Hemodynamic parameters, body movement, and coughing were recorded at predefined time points. The primary outcome was defined as optimal procedural stability, characterized by hemodynamic fluctuations within 10% of baseline combined with the absence of body movement or coughing. Results: = 0.716; p < 0.001). The qNOX index demonstrated a more rapid response to noxious stimuli than qCON during recovery phases. Conclusion: The qCON index appears to provide an objective approach to assessing sedation depth in sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy. Our findings suggest that qCON values within the range of 55 to 63 are associated with optimal procedural stability as defined in this study. Combined monitoring with qCON and qNOX may provide complementary information to support a balanced approach to intra-procedural sedation management, thereby potentially enhancing the safety and overall quality of sedation management. Trial Registration: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Registration Number: NCT06604156) on April 11, 2024.

Therapeutics and Clinical Risk ManagementVol. Volume 22
Suizhou Central Hospital (CN), The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN), Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.