Impact of the <scp>COVID</scp> ‐19 pandemic on missed opportunities for diagnosis of <scp>HIV</scp> infection: <scp>HUCS</scp> ‐ <scp>ODIPER</scp> (missed diagnostic opportunities) study

AIMS: The COVID-19 pandemic caused substantial disruption in healthcare, particularly in the monitoring and diagnosis of chronic diseases such as HIV infection. The reduction in diagnoses during the pandemic raised doubts about whether there was a true decrease in incidence or a higher rate of occult infection. Given guidelines' recommendations on using indicator conditions (ICs) for requesting HIV serology tests, it was proposed to study whether there was a change in missed diagnostic opportunities (MDOs). The main aim was to analyze the frequency of MDO in people living with HIV (PLWHIV) diagnosed in the pre-pandemic, pandemic and post-pandemic periods. Secondary aims included the frequency of late diagnosis (LD) and its relationship with clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. METHODS: This is an observational, retrospective, single-center study that included PLWHIV diagnosed between 2018 and 2023. The 5 years prior to diagnosis were reviewed to identify MDO, segmented by level of care. Clinical, immunovirological and follow-up variables were collected. RESULTS: Of 198 PLWHIV, 32.8% had at least one MDO. No differences were observed between periods, although there was a non-significant downward trend in the post-pandemic period. A total of 49.5% had an LD, which was associated with higher mortality (9.3% vs. 0%; p = 0.006). MDOs were more frequent in primary care and among heterosexuals. LD was more common in non-Spanish born. CONCLUSIONS: MDOs did not increase during the pandemic. High rates of LD and MDOs persist, especially for certain patient profiles. These findings reinforce the need to implement systematic screening strategies based on indicator conditions to improve early diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
HIV Medicine
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.70243
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of the COVID ‐19 pandemic on missed opportunities for diagnosis of HIV infection: HUCS ‐ ODIPER (missed diagnostic opportunities) study

Nicolás Jiménez-García, Francisco Rivas‐Ruiz, José Luis Prada Pardal, Ibon Henales Iruzubieta et al.
HIV Medicine
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Impact of the COVID ‐19 pandemic on missed opportunities for diagnosis of HIV infection: HUCS ‐ ODIPER (missed diagnostic opportunities) study

Nicolás Jiménez-García, Francisco Rivas‐Ruiz, José Luis Prada Pardal, Ibon Henales Iruzubieta, Fernando Fernández Sánchez, Miguel Ángel Patrón Hernández, Georgina Romero Marín, Javier de la Torre Lima, Silvia Soler Méndez, Julián Olalla Sierra, Alfonso del Arco Jiménez, Javier Pérez Stachowski
article en

Abstract

AIMS: The COVID-19 pandemic caused substantial disruption in healthcare, particularly in the monitoring and diagnosis of chronic diseases such as HIV infection. The reduction in diagnoses during the pandemic raised doubts about whether there was a true decrease in incidence or a higher rate of occult infection. Given guidelines' recommendations on using indicator conditions (ICs) for requesting HIV serology tests, it was proposed to study whether there was a change in missed diagnostic opportunities (MDOs). The main aim was to analyze the frequency of MDO in people living with HIV (PLWHIV) diagnosed in the pre-pandemic, pandemic and post-pandemic periods. Secondary aims included the frequency of late diagnosis (LD) and its relationship with clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. METHODS: This is an observational, retrospective, single-center study that included PLWHIV diagnosed between 2018 and 2023. The 5 years prior to diagnosis were reviewed to identify MDO, segmented by level of care. Clinical, immunovirological and follow-up variables were collected. RESULTS: Of 198 PLWHIV, 32.8% had at least one MDO. No differences were observed between periods, although there was a non-significant downward trend in the post-pandemic period. A total of 49.5% had an LD, which was associated with higher mortality (9.3% vs. 0%; p = 0.006). MDOs were more frequent in primary care and among heterosexuals. LD was more common in non-Spanish born. CONCLUSIONS: MDOs did not increase during the pandemic. High rates of LD and MDOs persist, especially for certain patient profiles. These findings reinforce the need to implement systematic screening strategies based on indicator conditions to improve early diagnosis.

HIV Medicine
Hospital Costa del Sol (ES), Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.