Circulating Tumour DNA and Extracellular Vesicle‐Associated DNA as Biomarkers for Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Liquid biopsy is an emerging tool that allows the detection and monitoring of tumours through the analysis of various analytes in biofluids like blood. An important component of liquid biopsy is circulating tumour (ct) DNA, small fragments of DNA that are released by cancer cells, which have been shown to be a robust biomarker and are already in use clinically. Recent research indicates that cancer cells can also release DNA via extracellular vesicles (EVs), and this EV-associated DNA (EV-DNA) has emerged as another promising biomarker for several tumour types. However, its clinical utility remains under investigation. In this meta-analysis, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of EV-DNA and ctDNA for detecting cancer-related mutations. Using the extracellular vesicle-associated DNA database (EV-ADD), which compiles all published literature on EV-DNA, we systematically mined data comparing ctDNA and EV-DNA in liquid biopsy as a cancer biomarker. After applying our inclusion criteria, we identified and analysed 12 studies involving 765 patients. Summary estimates showed a sensitivity of 64.6% (95% credible interval: 48.8%-79.4%) and specificity of 93.3% (95% credible interval: 86.8%-96.9%) for EV-DNA, compared to a sensitivity of 70.0% (95% credible interval: 54.7%-83.4%) and a specificity of 90.6% (95% credible interval: 80.8%-96.0%) for ctDNA. Additionally, studies with higher EV-ADD metric scores, reflecting adherence to MISEV guidelines, demonstrated higher probability of increased sensitivity and specificity for EV-DNA and increased sensitivity for ctDNA. This analysis underscores the potential of EV-DNA as a complementary biomarker to ctDNA in cancer detection. Future research should focus on larger patient cohorts and expand to other biofluids.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Extracellular Biology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jex2.70123
Primary Topic
Extracellular vesicles in disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Circulating Tumour DNA and Extracellular Vesicle‐Associated DNA as Biomarkers for Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Ian Schiller, Julia V. Burnier, Thupten Tsering, Venkata Ramana Agnihotram et al.
Journal of Extracellular Biology
Extracellular vesicles in disease
article

Circulating Tumour DNA and Extracellular Vesicle‐Associated DNA as Biomarkers for Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Ian Schiller, Julia V. Burnier, Thupten Tsering, Venkata Ramana Agnihotram, Kyle Dickinson, Amélie Nadeau, Nandini Dendukuri, Y Chen, Tad Wu
article en

Abstract

Liquid biopsy is an emerging tool that allows the detection and monitoring of tumours through the analysis of various analytes in biofluids like blood. An important component of liquid biopsy is circulating tumour (ct) DNA, small fragments of DNA that are released by cancer cells, which have been shown to be a robust biomarker and are already in use clinically. Recent research indicates that cancer cells can also release DNA via extracellular vesicles (EVs), and this EV-associated DNA (EV-DNA) has emerged as another promising biomarker for several tumour types. However, its clinical utility remains under investigation. In this meta-analysis, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of EV-DNA and ctDNA for detecting cancer-related mutations. Using the extracellular vesicle-associated DNA database (EV-ADD), which compiles all published literature on EV-DNA, we systematically mined data comparing ctDNA and EV-DNA in liquid biopsy as a cancer biomarker. After applying our inclusion criteria, we identified and analysed 12 studies involving 765 patients. Summary estimates showed a sensitivity of 64.6% (95% credible interval: 48.8%-79.4%) and specificity of 93.3% (95% credible interval: 86.8%-96.9%) for EV-DNA, compared to a sensitivity of 70.0% (95% credible interval: 54.7%-83.4%) and a specificity of 90.6% (95% credible interval: 80.8%-96.0%) for ctDNA. Additionally, studies with higher EV-ADD metric scores, reflecting adherence to MISEV guidelines, demonstrated higher probability of increased sensitivity and specificity for EV-DNA and increased sensitivity for ctDNA. This analysis underscores the potential of EV-DNA as a complementary biomarker to ctDNA in cancer detection. Future research should focus on larger patient cohorts and expand to other biofluids.

Journal of Extracellular BiologyVol. 5(4)
McGill University Health Centre (CA), McGill University (CA)
McGill University, Cancer Research Society, McGill University Health Centre, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Extracellular vesicles in disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.