Improved contraction of finite projected entangled pair states

We present an improved version of the algorithm contracting and optimizing finite projected entangled pair states (fPEPS) in conjunction with projected entangled pair operators (PEPOs). Our work has two components to it. First, we explain in detail the characteristic contraction patterns that occur in fPEPS calculations and how to slice them such that peak memory occupation remains minimal while ensuring efficient parallel computation. Second, we combine controlled bond expansion [A. Gleis, J.-W. Li, and J. von Delft, ] with randomized singular value decomposition [V. Rokhlin, A. Szlam, and M. Tygert, ] and apply it throughout the fPEPS algorithm. We present benchmark results for the Hubbard model for system sizes up to <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mrow> <a:mn>8</a:mn> <a:mo>×</a:mo> <a:mn>8</a:mn> </a:mrow> </a:math> and SU(2) symmetric bond dimension of up to <b:math xmlns:b="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <b:mrow> <b:mi>D</b:mi> <b:mo>=</b:mo> <b:mn>6</b:mn> </b:mrow> </b:math> for PEPS bonds and <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <c:mrow> <c:mi>χ</c:mi> <c:mo>=</c:mo> <c:mn>500</c:mn> </c:mrow> </c:math> for the environment bonds. Finally, we comment on the state and future of the fPEPS-PEPO framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. B./Physical review. B
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/sfxv-fvyc
Primary Topic
Quantum many-body systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improved contraction of finite projected entangled pair states

Anonymous
Physical review. B./Physical review. B
Quantum many-body systems
article

Improved contraction of finite projected entangled pair states

Anonymous
article en

Abstract

We present an improved version of the algorithm contracting and optimizing finite projected entangled pair states (fPEPS) in conjunction with projected entangled pair operators (PEPOs). Our work has two components to it. First, we explain in detail the characteristic contraction patterns that occur in fPEPS calculations and how to slice them such that peak memory occupation remains minimal while ensuring efficient parallel computation. Second, we combine controlled bond expansion [A. Gleis, J.-W. Li, and J. von Delft, ] with randomized singular value decomposition [V. Rokhlin, A. Szlam, and M. Tygert, ] and apply it throughout the fPEPS algorithm. We present benchmark results for the Hubbard model for system sizes up to <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mrow> <a:mn>8</a:mn> <a:mo>×</a:mo> <a:mn>8</a:mn> </a:mrow> </a:math> and SU(2) symmetric bond dimension of up to <b:math xmlns:b="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <b:mrow> <b:mi>D</b:mi> <b:mo>=</b:mo> <b:mn>6</b:mn> </b:mrow> </b:math> for PEPS bonds and <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <c:mrow> <c:mi>χ</c:mi> <c:mo>=</c:mo> <c:mn>500</c:mn> </c:mrow> </c:math> for the environment bonds. Finally, we comment on the state and future of the fPEPS-PEPO framework.

Physical review. B./Physical review. BVol. 113(20)
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Quantum many-body systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.