No Evidence of Polarization in the 11.3 <i>μ</i> m Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Emission Line by Independent Analyses

Abstract Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are commonly used as proxies for star formation, molecular gas content, and other interstellar medium (ISM) properties in our Galaxy and other galaxies. Given their abundance and brightness, polarization measurements of PAH features could, in principle, provide a probe of the ISM magnetic field and intrinsic PAH properties; however, the diagnostic power of PAH polarization remains to be established. Previous studies reported that the 11.3 μ m PAH emission line in the northwestern nebula of the Herbig Be star MWC 1080 was polarized at 1.9% ± 0.2%. This level of polarization was explained via the paramagnetic relaxation process, which may allow the characterization of magnetic fields in the ISM. Using the same observations, here, we reanalyzed the 8–13 μ m spectropolarimetric observations taken with CanariCam on the 10.4 m Gran Telescopio CANARIAS (GTC), and we measure a polarization of 0.5% ± 0.6% within 11.3 ± 0.2 μ m, consistent with an unpolarized source, 0.6% ± 0.2% (instrumental polarization). We reproduce the previously reported polarized PAH emission line if the polarization fraction spectrum is oversubtracted by a constant instrumental polarization and the polarization uncertainties, which is inconsistent with the fundamentals of polarimetric data analysis. Thus, the published 8–13 μ m spectropolarimetric data taken with CanariCam/GTC provide no statistical evidence for a polarized 11.3 μ m PAH emission line, in agreement with current dust models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae5654
Primary Topic
Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No Evidence of Polarization in the 11.3 μ m Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Emission Line by Independent Analyses

Enrique López-Rodríguez
The Astrophysical Journal
Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
article

No Evidence of Polarization in the 11.3 μ m Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Emission Line by Independent Analyses

Enrique López-Rodríguez
article en

Abstract

Abstract Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are commonly used as proxies for star formation, molecular gas content, and other interstellar medium (ISM) properties in our Galaxy and other galaxies. Given their abundance and brightness, polarization measurements of PAH features could, in principle, provide a probe of the ISM magnetic field and intrinsic PAH properties; however, the diagnostic power of PAH polarization remains to be established. Previous studies reported that the 11.3 μ m PAH emission line in the northwestern nebula of the Herbig Be star MWC 1080 was polarized at 1.9% ± 0.2%. This level of polarization was explained via the paramagnetic relaxation process, which may allow the characterization of magnetic fields in the ISM. Using the same observations, here, we reanalyzed the 8–13 μ m spectropolarimetric observations taken with CanariCam on the 10.4 m Gran Telescopio CANARIAS (GTC), and we measure a polarization of 0.5% ± 0.6% within 11.3 ± 0.2 μ m, consistent with an unpolarized source, 0.6% ± 0.2% (instrumental polarization). We reproduce the previously reported polarized PAH emission line if the polarization fraction spectrum is oversubtracted by a constant instrumental polarization and the polarization uncertainties, which is inconsistent with the fundamentals of polarimetric data analysis. Thus, the published 8–13 μ m spectropolarimetric data taken with CanariCam/GTC provide no statistical evidence for a polarized 11.3 μ m PAH emission line, in agreement with current dust models.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 1001(2)
University of South Carolina (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.