Midwives' and obstetricians' perspectives on collaborative practice in antenatal care: a qualitative systematic review protocol

OBJECTIVE: This qualitative systematic review will aim to synthesize evidence on midwives' and obstetricians' perspectives on collaborative practice in antenatal care. The review will identify barriers and facilitators of collaboration, ultimately improving maternal and neonatal outcomes. INTRODUCTION: Fragmented health care and the shortage of professionals hinder the provision of antenatal care. Collaboration between midwives and obstetricians is essential but is often impeded by differing philosophies, structures, and tensions. To identify these conditions and to explore and synthesize both perspectives, a qualitative systematic review is required. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: This review will focus on qualitative studies exploring midwives' and obstetricians' perceptions and experiences of collaborative practices in antenatal care. There will be no restrictions on care setting, study date, geographic location, demographic characteristics, or cultural context. The studies will be limited to routine antenatal care, encompassing appointments, risk factors, and screenings. METHODS: The review will follow JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. A comprehensive search strategy, limited to English and German, will retrieve published articles and gray literature from MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection, Midwives Information & Resource Service (MIDIRS), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Citation Index (Web of Science), and Google. Study selection, abstract/full-text screening, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis will be conducted independently by 2 reviewers. A third reviewer will arbitrate unresolved decisions. Midwives and obstetricians will provide feedback on synthesized findings to bridge scientific evidence and practice, enhancing practical recommendations. REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42025644640.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JBI Evidence Synthesis
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-25-00170
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Midwives' and obstetricians' perspectives on collaborative practice in antenatal care: a qualitative systematic review protocol

Linda Biesty, Chris Cooper, Martin Fangmeyer, Isolde Sommer et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

Midwives' and obstetricians' perspectives on collaborative practice in antenatal care: a qualitative systematic review protocol

Linda Biesty, Chris Cooper, Martin Fangmeyer, Isolde Sommer, Irma Klerings, H Stummer, Camilla Neubauer-Bruckner
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This qualitative systematic review will aim to synthesize evidence on midwives' and obstetricians' perspectives on collaborative practice in antenatal care. The review will identify barriers and facilitators of collaboration, ultimately improving maternal and neonatal outcomes. INTRODUCTION: Fragmented health care and the shortage of professionals hinder the provision of antenatal care. Collaboration between midwives and obstetricians is essential but is often impeded by differing philosophies, structures, and tensions. To identify these conditions and to explore and synthesize both perspectives, a qualitative systematic review is required. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: This review will focus on qualitative studies exploring midwives' and obstetricians' perceptions and experiences of collaborative practices in antenatal care. There will be no restrictions on care setting, study date, geographic location, demographic characteristics, or cultural context. The studies will be limited to routine antenatal care, encompassing appointments, risk factors, and screenings. METHODS: The review will follow JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. A comprehensive search strategy, limited to English and German, will retrieve published articles and gray literature from MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection, Midwives Information & Resource Service (MIDIRS), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Citation Index (Web of Science), and Google. Study selection, abstract/full-text screening, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis will be conducted independently by 2 reviewers. A third reviewer will arbitrate unresolved decisions. Midwives and obstetricians will provide feedback on synthesized findings to bridge scientific evidence and practice, enhancing practical recommendations. REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42025644640.

JBI Evidence Synthesis
Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), University of Bristol (GB), UMIT - Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik (AT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.