Immunonutrition for the Management of Postsurgery GI Cancer Patients

Postoperative complications in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients remain a significant challenge for physicians. It leads to increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and higher healthcare costs. Enteral immunonutrition (EIN) has emerged as a promising add-on treatment to modulate immune response following surgery. In fact, it reduces inflammation and promotes patients' recovery. Indeed, the literature data on its real clinical impact for the patients are inconsistent and, yet, poorly investigated. Thus, the aim of this review was to narratively assess the current evidence for the use of EIN in postoperative GI cancer patients, evaluating the effect on clinical and immunological outcomes of patients. Therefore, a literature search was conducted using the following keywords and associations: enteral immunonutrition, gastrointestinal cancer, immune response, inflammation, and postoperative complication. GI cancers, mainly esophageal and gastric cancer, represent a significant global health burden, characterized by high incidence and mortality rates. The complex interplay between tumor progression, systemic inflammation, and host nutritional status profoundly impacts patient outcomes. Traditional cancer treatments are effective and often lead to severe side effects. The latter includes malnutrition and immunosuppression and can significantly affect patients' recovery. In recent times, the concept of immunonutrition has emerged as a promising add-on therapy able to consensually modulate immune response and improve nutritional status. Several studies and meta-analyses suggest that EIN can reduce postoperative infections (e.g., wound infections and sepsis incidence), shorten hospital stays, and improve overall outcomes in GI cancer surgery patients vs. standard enteral feeding. EIN is a promising add-on approach for the management of postoperative GI cancer patients. It can significantly reduce postoperative complications and enhance their recovery. However, the result seems consistent for gastric but not yet esophageal cancer patients. EIN shows high tolerance and a high safety profile.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18081229
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immunonutrition for the Management of Postsurgery GI Cancer Patients

Emidio Scarpellini, Carlo Rasetti, Ludovico Abenavoli, Marialaura Scarcella et al.
Nutrients
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
article

Immunonutrition for the Management of Postsurgery GI Cancer Patients

Emidio Scarpellini, Carlo Rasetti, Ludovico Abenavoli, Marialaura Scarcella, Domenico Morano, Jan Tack, Giacomo Recanatini, Arianna Di Bernardino, Annalisa Pezzoli
article en

Abstract

Postoperative complications in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients remain a significant challenge for physicians. It leads to increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and higher healthcare costs. Enteral immunonutrition (EIN) has emerged as a promising add-on treatment to modulate immune response following surgery. In fact, it reduces inflammation and promotes patients' recovery. Indeed, the literature data on its real clinical impact for the patients are inconsistent and, yet, poorly investigated. Thus, the aim of this review was to narratively assess the current evidence for the use of EIN in postoperative GI cancer patients, evaluating the effect on clinical and immunological outcomes of patients. Therefore, a literature search was conducted using the following keywords and associations: enteral immunonutrition, gastrointestinal cancer, immune response, inflammation, and postoperative complication. GI cancers, mainly esophageal and gastric cancer, represent a significant global health burden, characterized by high incidence and mortality rates. The complex interplay between tumor progression, systemic inflammation, and host nutritional status profoundly impacts patient outcomes. Traditional cancer treatments are effective and often lead to severe side effects. The latter includes malnutrition and immunosuppression and can significantly affect patients' recovery. In recent times, the concept of immunonutrition has emerged as a promising add-on therapy able to consensually modulate immune response and improve nutritional status. Several studies and meta-analyses suggest that EIN can reduce postoperative infections (e.g., wound infections and sepsis incidence), shorten hospital stays, and improve overall outcomes in GI cancer surgery patients vs. standard enteral feeding. EIN is a promising add-on approach for the management of postoperative GI cancer patients. It can significantly reduce postoperative complications and enhance their recovery. However, the result seems consistent for gastric but not yet esophageal cancer patients. EIN shows high tolerance and a high safety profile.

NutrientsVol. 18(8)
University of Sannio (IT), University of Perugia (IT), Magna Graecia University (IT), Dulbecco Telethon Institute (IT), KU Leuven (BE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.