From Concept to Clinic: Pre‐Clinical Testing and Regulatory Considerations in Spine Implant Development

Background: (DHF) through post-market surveillance, is essential to smoothly transform an innovative idea into a safe and effective clinical product. Methods: (FEA), bench testing, and fatigue studies, are integrated into the pre-market submission dossier. Discussion: trials, digital twins, and smart implants show promise, while global differences in classification, clinical requirements, and post-market expectations highlight the ongoing challenge of regulatory divergence. Conclusion: Understanding the biomechanical foundations of the development process is crucial for the safe and successful translation of spine implants into clinical use. Surgeons and implant designers should engage early, understand the critical steps, and advocate for rigorous validation aligned with regulatory expectations to deliver safer and more effective implants to clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JOR Spine
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsp2.70176
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Concept to Clinic: Pre‐Clinical Testing and Regulatory Considerations in Spine Implant Development

Morsi Khashan, Ryan D. Quarrington, B. Gangadhara Prusty, Jerrin Thadathil Varghese et al.
JOR Spine
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

From Concept to Clinic: Pre‐Clinical Testing and Regulatory Considerations in Spine Implant Development

Morsi Khashan, Ryan D. Quarrington, B. Gangadhara Prusty, Jerrin Thadathil Varghese, Amit Benady, Ashish Diwan
article en

Abstract

Background: (DHF) through post-market surveillance, is essential to smoothly transform an innovative idea into a safe and effective clinical product. Methods: (FEA), bench testing, and fatigue studies, are integrated into the pre-market submission dossier. Discussion: trials, digital twins, and smart implants show promise, while global differences in classification, clinical requirements, and post-market expectations highlight the ongoing challenge of regulatory divergence. Conclusion: Understanding the biomechanical foundations of the development process is crucial for the safe and successful translation of spine implants into clinical use. Surgeons and implant designers should engage early, understand the critical steps, and advocate for rigorous validation aligned with regulatory expectations to deliver safer and more effective implants to clinical practice.

JOR SpineVol. 9(2)
Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU), Tel Aviv University (IL), Sutherland Hospital (AU), Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL), UNSW Sydney (AU), ARC Centre of Excellence in Advanced Molecular Imaging (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
University of New South Wales
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From Concept to Clinic: Pre‐Clinical Testing and Regulatory Considerations in Spine Implant Development — Morsi Khashan, Ryan D. Quarrington, et al. · JOR Spine (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS