Multi-site validation of an AI-based biomarker test for determining ER, PR, and HER2 status from H&E-stained breast cancer slides

Background: hybridisation (ISH) are widely used, but they are resource-intensive and time-consuming. To address these challenges, we developed PANProfiler Breast (PPB), an artificial intelligence (AI)-based digital test to analyse images of haematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-stained slides for BC biomarker assessment. Materials and methods: PPB was validated on a large, diverse cohort of 3138 unique BC samples from five sites across the UK and United States. The validation included both biopsy and resection specimens, digitally scanned using multiple imaging platforms. Standard performance characteristics were assessed by comparison with IHC and ISH reference assays. Results: PPB consistently demonstrated high performance across multiple cohorts, confirming its effectiveness for establishing the status of ER/PR and assessing HER2 negativity for BC patients. HER2 achieved an average sensitivity of 90.6% (±0.6) and a concordance of 93.7% (±7.8%) when determining the negative status. For ER, we measured an overall sensitivity and specificity of 98.2% (±0.3%) and 62.0% (±7.3%), averaged over all sites, respectively. For PR the averaged sensitivity and specificity across all sites were 97.9% (±1.0%) and 45.7% (±1.6%), respectively. Conclusions: Integrating PPB into routine clinical workflows could enable rapid and accurate assessment of BC biomarkers, improving access to targeted therapies and enhancing clinical decision making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmorw.2026.100702
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-site validation of an AI-based biomarker test for determining ER, PR, and HER2 status from H&E-stained breast cancer slides

Cher Bass, Richard Clarkson, Foivos Ntelemis, J.J. Staves et al.
ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Multi-site validation of an AI-based biomarker test for determining ER, PR, and HER2 status from H&E-stained breast cancer slides

Cher Bass, Richard Clarkson, Foivos Ntelemis, J.J. Staves, Gareth Bryson, Salim Arslan, David J. Harrison, I.H. Um, J. Loane, Jakob Nikolas Kather, L. Spary, A. Ironside, D. Leff, A. Marcia, A. Geraldes, J. Blackwood, S. Singhal, P. Pandya, J.J. Schmidt, O. Maiques, S. Wolf, S.A. Khurram, N.S. Sanath Kumar, D. Mehrotra
article en

Abstract

Background: hybridisation (ISH) are widely used, but they are resource-intensive and time-consuming. To address these challenges, we developed PANProfiler Breast (PPB), an artificial intelligence (AI)-based digital test to analyse images of haematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-stained slides for BC biomarker assessment. Materials and methods: PPB was validated on a large, diverse cohort of 3138 unique BC samples from five sites across the UK and United States. The validation included both biopsy and resection specimens, digitally scanned using multiple imaging platforms. Standard performance characteristics were assessed by comparison with IHC and ISH reference assays. Results: PPB consistently demonstrated high performance across multiple cohorts, confirming its effectiveness for establishing the status of ER/PR and assessing HER2 negativity for BC patients. HER2 achieved an average sensitivity of 90.6% (±0.6) and a concordance of 93.7% (±7.8%) when determining the negative status. For ER, we measured an overall sensitivity and specificity of 98.2% (±0.3%) and 62.0% (±7.3%), averaged over all sites, respectively. For PR the averaged sensitivity and specificity across all sites were 97.9% (±1.0%) and 45.7% (±1.6%), respectively. Conclusions: Integrating PPB into routine clinical workflows could enable rapid and accurate assessment of BC biomarkers, improving access to targeted therapies and enhancing clinical decision making.

ESMO Real World Data and Digital OncologyVol. 12
NHS Lothian (GB), Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of St Andrews (GB), Heidelberg University (DE), Western General Hospital (GB), NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GB), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Pan-European University (SK), Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), National Center for Tumor Diseases (DE), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE), Cardiff University (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Pfizer, AstraZeneca, NuCana, Innovate UK, Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.