Effect of inhaled anticholinergics on bronchial secretions: a systematic review

Background: Inhaled anticholinergics are commonly used in chronic respiratory diseases with the intention of reducing bronchial secretions in addition to their bronchodilatory effects. However, evidence regarding their direct influence on mucus production and clearance remains limited and fragmented. This study aimed to identify, evaluate, and synthesize the available evidence on the effects of inhaled and nebulized anticholinergics on mucus volume, rheological properties, mucociliary clearance, cough, and pulmonary function in adults. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024575999). Comprehensive searches were performed in PubMed, OVID, Embase, SciELO, EBSCO, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library without date restrictions. Randomized and non-randomized studies assessing inhaled or nebulized anticholinergics were included. Risk of bias was evaluated using the RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. Results: Out of 2,449 records identified, eight studies comprising 403 participants met the inclusion criteria. Under stable clinical conditions, inhaled ipratropium and tiotropium showed no significant changes in sputum volume, viscosity, or mucociliary clearance compared with placebo. In acute or procedural settings, such as bronchoscopy, nebulized ipratropium was associated with a reduction in bronchial secretion grade and cough frequency. Tiotropium treatment demonstrated decreases in sputum solid fraction and mucin content (MUC5AC and MUC5B). None of the included studies reported impairment of mucociliary clearance or serious adverse events related to treatment. Conclusion: Current evidence does not demonstrate a consistent effect of inhaled or nebulized anticholinergics on sustained reduction of bronchial secretions. However, their use does not appear to cause adverse changes in mucus production or clearance and may induce transient effects during acute cholinergic stimulation. Overall, the findings support a favorable safety profile of these agents regarding airway secretion management. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024575999.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Physiology
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2026.1790151
Primary Topic
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of inhaled anticholinergics on bronchial secretions: a systematic review

Valeria Pérez-Hortua, Leonardo Arzayus-Patiño, Esther Cecilia Wilches-Luna, Vicente Benavides-Cordoba et al.
Frontiers in Physiology
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
article

Effect of inhaled anticholinergics on bronchial secretions: a systematic review

Valeria Pérez-Hortua, Leonardo Arzayus-Patiño, Esther Cecilia Wilches-Luna, Vicente Benavides-Cordoba, José Julián Bernal-Sanchez
article en

Abstract

Background: Inhaled anticholinergics are commonly used in chronic respiratory diseases with the intention of reducing bronchial secretions in addition to their bronchodilatory effects. However, evidence regarding their direct influence on mucus production and clearance remains limited and fragmented. This study aimed to identify, evaluate, and synthesize the available evidence on the effects of inhaled and nebulized anticholinergics on mucus volume, rheological properties, mucociliary clearance, cough, and pulmonary function in adults. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024575999). Comprehensive searches were performed in PubMed, OVID, Embase, SciELO, EBSCO, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library without date restrictions. Randomized and non-randomized studies assessing inhaled or nebulized anticholinergics were included. Risk of bias was evaluated using the RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. Results: Out of 2,449 records identified, eight studies comprising 403 participants met the inclusion criteria. Under stable clinical conditions, inhaled ipratropium and tiotropium showed no significant changes in sputum volume, viscosity, or mucociliary clearance compared with placebo. In acute or procedural settings, such as bronchoscopy, nebulized ipratropium was associated with a reduction in bronchial secretion grade and cough frequency. Tiotropium treatment demonstrated decreases in sputum solid fraction and mucin content (MUC5AC and MUC5B). None of the included studies reported impairment of mucociliary clearance or serious adverse events related to treatment. Conclusion: Current evidence does not demonstrate a consistent effect of inhaled or nebulized anticholinergics on sustained reduction of bronchial secretions. However, their use does not appear to cause adverse changes in mucus production or clearance and may induce transient effects during acute cholinergic stimulation. Overall, the findings support a favorable safety profile of these agents regarding airway secretion management. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024575999.

Frontiers in PhysiologyVol. 17
Universidad Santiago de Cali (CO), Escuela Colombiana de Rehabilitación (CO), Universidad del Valle (CR), Consejería de Salud y Consumo (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.