Enhancing School Students’ Self-Regulated Learning through Generative AI Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Self-regulated learning (SRL) is a critical competency for academic success and lifelong learning, yet providing personalized SRL support in real-time classroom settings remains challenging. In this randomized controlled trial, we investigated whether generative-AI-(GenAI)-based interventions can effectively support SRL in secondary school students. Drawing on an integrative model of self-regulation in education, the study contrasted two types of GenAI-supported interventions—targeting either motivational (utility value) or strategic (cognitive-learning-strategy-based) aspects of SRL—with a control condition using standard ChatGPT. A total of 371 students (Grades 7–9) were randomly assigned to one of the three conditions and participated in six 45-min sessions during regular physics or English lessons. Outcome measures included self-reported utility value, strategy use (self-reported and tested performance), interest, effort, and tested domain-specific knowledge, assessed at pre- and posttest. The results showed that students in the utility value condition reported more favorable development of perceived utility value than those in the cognitive strategy condition. However, no statistically significant advantages of either intervention over the control condition were found for effort, domain-specific knowledge, or elaboration-based strategy use. Exploratory analyses indicated that students who engaged more meaningfully with the GenAI tended to have more sustained interest than those in the control group. No subject-specific (physics or English) differences in intervention effects were observed. Findings suggest GenAI-based interventions may help preserve motivational aspects of SRL under certain conditions, but further development is needed to effectively support cognitive strategies and improve learning outcomes in secondary school settings. GenAI-based tools were tested for promoting SRL in a school-based RCT design. Utility value prompts helped preserve students’ utility value in the learning content. No clear condition differences emerged for other learning outcomes. Exploratory analyses revealed that meaningful GPT interactions buffered motivational declines. The study provides ideas for scalable and classroom-integrated SRL support using GenAI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Psychology Review
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10133-8
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing School Students’ Self-Regulated Learning through Generative AI Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Jochen Kühn, Tim Fütterer, Lisa Bardach, Peter Gerjets et al.
Educational Psychology Review
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

Enhancing School Students’ Self-Regulated Learning through Generative AI Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Jochen Kühn, Tim Fütterer, Lisa Bardach, Peter Gerjets, Stefan Daniel Keller
article en

Abstract

Self-regulated learning (SRL) is a critical competency for academic success and lifelong learning, yet providing personalized SRL support in real-time classroom settings remains challenging. In this randomized controlled trial, we investigated whether generative-AI-(GenAI)-based interventions can effectively support SRL in secondary school students. Drawing on an integrative model of self-regulation in education, the study contrasted two types of GenAI-supported interventions—targeting either motivational (utility value) or strategic (cognitive-learning-strategy-based) aspects of SRL—with a control condition using standard ChatGPT. A total of 371 students (Grades 7–9) were randomly assigned to one of the three conditions and participated in six 45-min sessions during regular physics or English lessons. Outcome measures included self-reported utility value, strategy use (self-reported and tested performance), interest, effort, and tested domain-specific knowledge, assessed at pre- and posttest. The results showed that students in the utility value condition reported more favorable development of perceived utility value than those in the cognitive strategy condition. However, no statistically significant advantages of either intervention over the control condition were found for effort, domain-specific knowledge, or elaboration-based strategy use. Exploratory analyses indicated that students who engaged more meaningfully with the GenAI tended to have more sustained interest than those in the control group. No subject-specific (physics or English) differences in intervention effects were observed. Findings suggest GenAI-based interventions may help preserve motivational aspects of SRL under certain conditions, but further development is needed to effectively support cognitive strategies and improve learning outcomes in secondary school settings. GenAI-based tools were tested for promoting SRL in a school-based RCT design. Utility value prompts helped preserve students’ utility value in the learning content. No clear condition differences emerged for other learning outcomes. Exploratory analyses revealed that meaningful GPT interactions buffered motivational declines. The study provides ideas for scalable and classroom-integrated SRL support using GenAI.

Educational Psychology ReviewVol. 38(1)
Kaunas University of Technology (LT), Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), Zurich University of Teacher Education (CH), Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien (DE), Giessen School of Theology (DE), University of Tübingen (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Baden-Württemberg Stiftung, Australian Government, European Commission, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Jacobs Foundation, Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba, Kauno Technologijos Universitetas, Institute of Education Sciences
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.