Optimal design of negative stiffness amplifying damper for seismic response control of damped civil structures

The negative stiffness amplifying damper (NSAD), as one of the passive control devices, has been shown to effectively mitigate seismic vibrations in engineering structures. However, existing studies have predominantly concentrated on the simplified closed-form solution for the optimal design parameters of NSAD derived under the assumption that the primary structure is undamped. Therefore, one of the contributions of this study lies in proposing a closed-form solution for determining the optimal design parameters of NSAD while considering the damping ratio of the primary structure. To achieve this objective, the analytical formulation for the effective damping ratio (EDR) of the NSAD is established to assess its control performance. The optimal closed-form solution for NSAD parameters (referred to as the EDR solution) is derived by maximizing the EDR to achieve optimal control performance. The applicable ranges of the negative stiffness ratio and the positive stiffness ratio for the EDR solution are specified with respect to the stability condition and the effective damping ratio enhancement (EDRE) effect, respectively. The applicability of the EDR solution is rigorously validated through comparative analysis against the fixed-point solution, employing both frequency-domain and time-history analyses. The results indicate that the EDR solution can be regarded as more accurate and reasonable compared to the simplified closed-form solution derived from the undamped primary structure hypothesis, particularly for positive stiffness ratios exceeding 0.1. Moreover, the enhanced effectiveness of the EDR solution in mitigating displacement responses of the primary structure, as compared to the fixed-point solution, is attributable to its superior ability to control system input energy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219455427503810
Primary Topic
Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal design of negative stiffness amplifying damper for seismic response control of damped civil structures

Zhengrong Zhu, Linfei Hao, Longji Zhu, Yue Xiang et al.
International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics
Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
article

Optimal design of negative stiffness amplifying damper for seismic response control of damped civil structures

Zhengrong Zhu, Linfei Hao, Longji Zhu, Yue Xiang, Hui He, Yun Zhou
article en

Abstract

The negative stiffness amplifying damper (NSAD), as one of the passive control devices, has been shown to effectively mitigate seismic vibrations in engineering structures. However, existing studies have predominantly concentrated on the simplified closed-form solution for the optimal design parameters of NSAD derived under the assumption that the primary structure is undamped. Therefore, one of the contributions of this study lies in proposing a closed-form solution for determining the optimal design parameters of NSAD while considering the damping ratio of the primary structure. To achieve this objective, the analytical formulation for the effective damping ratio (EDR) of the NSAD is established to assess its control performance. The optimal closed-form solution for NSAD parameters (referred to as the EDR solution) is derived by maximizing the EDR to achieve optimal control performance. The applicable ranges of the negative stiffness ratio and the positive stiffness ratio for the EDR solution are specified with respect to the stability condition and the effective damping ratio enhancement (EDRE) effect, respectively. The applicability of the EDR solution is rigorously validated through comparative analysis against the fixed-point solution, employing both frequency-domain and time-history analyses. The results indicate that the EDR solution can be regarded as more accurate and reasonable compared to the simplified closed-form solution derived from the undamped primary structure hypothesis, particularly for positive stiffness ratios exceeding 0.1. Moreover, the enhanced effectiveness of the EDR solution in mitigating displacement responses of the primary structure, as compared to the fixed-point solution, is attributable to its superior ability to control system input energy.

International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.