Assessment of real-time measurements of respirable dust and crystalline silica concentrations

Real-time measurements of Respirable Crystalline Silica (RCS) can significantly enhance the capability of workplaces in conducting timely risk assessment and monitoring. A new device has recently been launched (Trolex Air-XS, United Kingdom) for real-time monitoring of RCS based on light-scattering optical refractometry technology. This study aimed to examine its capability in determining concentrations of respirable particles in general and distinguishing RCS proportions from other particulates. Tests were carried out in a controlled environmental chamber using various dust samples with different RCS content, employing two other light-scattering-based devices (Fidas Frog (Palas GmbH, Germany) and TSI DustTrak DRX 8533 (Shoreview, Minnesota, USA)). The tests revealed that while Air-XS demonstrated strong temporal correlation to the particle concentration readings of Fidas, it tended to record significantly lower particle number concentrations, largely because it does not include the sub-1-micron particle range within its algorithm/sensor capabilities. This presents a significant limitation, as sub-1-micron-sized particles are significant determinants in the toxicity of respirable aerosols. This study also found that the Air-XS device was unable to distinguish crystalline silica from general particulate dusts, possibly due to the relatively low dust loading in the test environment. Some measurements with the Fidas and the DustTrak indicated environments that were nearing the Australian Workplace Exposure Standard concentration, suggesting further controlled testing is needed to thoroughly assess the Air-XS capability in detecting and measuring RCS. These findings indicate that while the Air-XS may serve as a real-time indicator of high concentrations of respirable particles, it is not a substitute for established RCS assessment methods. Further independent testing across various conditions is needed to confirm its accuracy, sensitivity, and reliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2026.2640000
Primary Topic
Occupational and environmental lung diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of real-time measurements of respirable dust and crystalline silica concentrations

R. Mead-Hunter, R. N. Carey, M. Gumulya
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Occupational and environmental lung diseases
article

Assessment of real-time measurements of respirable dust and crystalline silica concentrations

R. Mead-Hunter, R. N. Carey, M. Gumulya
article en

Abstract

Real-time measurements of Respirable Crystalline Silica (RCS) can significantly enhance the capability of workplaces in conducting timely risk assessment and monitoring. A new device has recently been launched (Trolex Air-XS, United Kingdom) for real-time monitoring of RCS based on light-scattering optical refractometry technology. This study aimed to examine its capability in determining concentrations of respirable particles in general and distinguishing RCS proportions from other particulates. Tests were carried out in a controlled environmental chamber using various dust samples with different RCS content, employing two other light-scattering-based devices (Fidas Frog (Palas GmbH, Germany) and TSI DustTrak DRX 8533 (Shoreview, Minnesota, USA)). The tests revealed that while Air-XS demonstrated strong temporal correlation to the particle concentration readings of Fidas, it tended to record significantly lower particle number concentrations, largely because it does not include the sub-1-micron particle range within its algorithm/sensor capabilities. This presents a significant limitation, as sub-1-micron-sized particles are significant determinants in the toxicity of respirable aerosols. This study also found that the Air-XS device was unable to distinguish crystalline silica from general particulate dusts, possibly due to the relatively low dust loading in the test environment. Some measurements with the Fidas and the DustTrak indicated environments that were nearing the Australian Workplace Exposure Standard concentration, suggesting further controlled testing is needed to thoroughly assess the Air-XS capability in detecting and measuring RCS. These findings indicate that while the Air-XS may serve as a real-time indicator of high concentrations of respirable particles, it is not a substitute for established RCS assessment methods. Further independent testing across various conditions is needed to confirm its accuracy, sensitivity, and reliability.

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Curtin University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Occupational and environmental lung diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessment of real-time measurements of respirable dust and crystalline silica concentrations — R. Mead-Hunter, R. N. Carey, et al. · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS