Estimating True Patient Cost-Sharing Burden: Multi-Payer Claim Reconciliation in an All-Payer Claims Database

= 70,100), reconciliation of claims across multiple payers markedly lowered estimated cost-sharing for patients with more than one source of coverage ($5,544 (no reconciliation); $5,013 (primary payer only) to $1,580). The largest reductions in cost-sharing after reconciliation were for individuals with Traditional Medicare with Medigap ($6,449→$1,123; Δ = -$5,326), dual Medicare-Medicaid ($4,439→$2,340; Δ = -$2,099), and Medicaid-commercial ($2,708→$2,009; Δ = -$699). Excluding secondary payments from estimates of cost-sharing systematically inflates cost-sharing estimates. A transparent reconciliation algorithm is necessary to correctly estimate cost-sharing and is recommended for researchers and policymakers who use the APCD for estimating costs across payers and to the patient.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Care Research and Review
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587261437729
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating True Patient Cost-Sharing Burden: Multi-Payer Claim Reconciliation in an All-Payer Claims Database

Marcelo Coca Perraillon, Lindsay M. Sabik, Richard C. Lindrooth, Rick DeVoss
Medical Care Research and Review
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Estimating True Patient Cost-Sharing Burden: Multi-Payer Claim Reconciliation in an All-Payer Claims Database

Marcelo Coca Perraillon, Lindsay M. Sabik, Richard C. Lindrooth, Rick DeVoss
article en

Abstract

= 70,100), reconciliation of claims across multiple payers markedly lowered estimated cost-sharing for patients with more than one source of coverage ($5,544 (no reconciliation); $5,013 (primary payer only) to $1,580). The largest reductions in cost-sharing after reconciliation were for individuals with Traditional Medicare with Medigap ($6,449→$1,123; Δ = -$5,326), dual Medicare-Medicaid ($4,439→$2,340; Δ = -$2,099), and Medicaid-commercial ($2,708→$2,009; Δ = -$699). Excluding secondary payments from estimates of cost-sharing systematically inflates cost-sharing estimates. A transparent reconciliation algorithm is necessary to correctly estimate cost-sharing and is recommended for researchers and policymakers who use the APCD for estimating costs across payers and to the patient.

Medical Care Research and Review
University of Pittsburgh (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.