Estimating True Patient Cost-Sharing Burden: Multi-Payer Claim Reconciliation in an All-Payer Claims Database
= 70,100), reconciliation of claims across multiple payers markedly lowered estimated cost-sharing for patients with more than one source of coverage ($5,544 (no reconciliation); $5,013 (primary payer only) to $1,580). The largest reductions in cost-sharing after reconciliation were for individuals with Traditional Medicare with Medigap ($6,449→$1,123; Δ = -$5,326), dual Medicare-Medicaid ($4,439→$2,340; Δ = -$2,099), and Medicaid-commercial ($2,708→$2,009; Δ = -$699). Excluding secondary payments from estimates of cost-sharing systematically inflates cost-sharing estimates. A transparent reconciliation algorithm is necessary to correctly estimate cost-sharing and is recommended for researchers and policymakers who use the APCD for estimating costs across payers and to the patient.
Authors
- Marcelo Coca Perraillon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3355-3720)
- Lindsay M. Sabik (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0613-4929)
- Richard C. Lindrooth (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9538-9749)
- Rick DeVoss (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8062-9647)
Institutions
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Medical Care Research and Review
- Published
- 2026-04-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587261437729
- Primary Topic
- Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute