INVESTIGATING THE SENATE LEADERSHIP FINANCIAL MISAPPROPRIATION PROBE: THE PROFOUND CHALLENGE OF EFCC'S ROLE IN ENSURING ACCOUNTABILITY AND JUSTICE IN GOVERNANCE

This study interrogates the pervasive phenomenon of financial misappropriation and governance failure within Nigeria’s legislative architecture, with particular emphasis on Senate leadership and the broader institutional complicity that undermines public accountability. The main objective of the study is to critically examine the patterns, causes, and consequences of financial abuse in public office, while advancing pragmatic recommendations for strengthening transparency, fiscal discipline, and institutional integrity. The study adopts a mixed-methods research design, integrating both qualitative and quantitative approaches to ensure analytical depth and empirical robustness. Data were sourced from primary and secondary materials, including structured questionnaires, key informant interviews, government reports, legislative records, audit documents, publications from international organisations, and reputable media outlets. The tools employed for data analysis include descriptive statistics, inferential analysis, and thematic content analysis, facilitated through the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. The Taro Yamane mathematical formula was applied to determine an appropriate sample size, ensuring representativeness and statistical validity. The study further adopts strategic analytical techniques such as triangulation, comparative analysis, and institutional critique to enhance the reliability of findings. Anchored on the Institutional Theory and Public Choice Theory, the research provides a theoretical framework for understanding the interplay between personal interests, systemic weaknesses, and governance outcomes. Findings reveal entrenched patterns of financial mismanagement, weak oversight mechanisms, legislative impunity, and the ineffective role of critical institutions such as anti-corruption agencies and the judiciary in enforcing accountability. The study establishes that the persistence of these anomalies is largely attributable to systemic opacity, political interference, and inadequate enforcement of legal frameworks. Consequently, the study recommends comprehensive institutional reforms, strengthened legislative oversight, enhanced transparency mechanisms, judicial independence, and the adoption of stricter sanctions against financial misconduct. The study unequivocally asserts that without decisive and uncompromising reforms, the integrity of Nigeria’s governance system will remain fundamentally compromised, thereby perpetuating a cycle of economic stagnation and public distrust.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19565205
Primary Topic
Corruption and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INVESTIGATING THE SENATE LEADERSHIP FINANCIAL MISAPPROPRIATION PROBE: THE PROFOUND CHALLENGE OF EFCC'S ROLE IN ENSURING ACCOUNTABILITY AND JUSTICE IN GOVERNANCE

Ass. Professor Orie Sylvester Okorie, PhD, MSc, MPA, MBA, PGD, BSc, CNA, FCNA, FNIM, FCAI., Rev. Fr. Dr. Egbe, Justin A., PhD
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Corruption and Economic Development
article

INVESTIGATING THE SENATE LEADERSHIP FINANCIAL MISAPPROPRIATION PROBE: THE PROFOUND CHALLENGE OF EFCC'S ROLE IN ENSURING ACCOUNTABILITY AND JUSTICE IN GOVERNANCE

Ass. Professor Orie Sylvester Okorie, PhD, MSc, MPA, MBA, PGD, BSc, CNA, FCNA, FNIM, FCAI., Rev. Fr. Dr. Egbe, Justin A., PhD
article en

Abstract

This study interrogates the pervasive phenomenon of financial misappropriation and governance failure within Nigeria’s legislative architecture, with particular emphasis on Senate leadership and the broader institutional complicity that undermines public accountability. The main objective of the study is to critically examine the patterns, causes, and consequences of financial abuse in public office, while advancing pragmatic recommendations for strengthening transparency, fiscal discipline, and institutional integrity. The study adopts a mixed-methods research design, integrating both qualitative and quantitative approaches to ensure analytical depth and empirical robustness. Data were sourced from primary and secondary materials, including structured questionnaires, key informant interviews, government reports, legislative records, audit documents, publications from international organisations, and reputable media outlets. The tools employed for data analysis include descriptive statistics, inferential analysis, and thematic content analysis, facilitated through the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. The Taro Yamane mathematical formula was applied to determine an appropriate sample size, ensuring representativeness and statistical validity. The study further adopts strategic analytical techniques such as triangulation, comparative analysis, and institutional critique to enhance the reliability of findings. Anchored on the Institutional Theory and Public Choice Theory, the research provides a theoretical framework for understanding the interplay between personal interests, systemic weaknesses, and governance outcomes. Findings reveal entrenched patterns of financial mismanagement, weak oversight mechanisms, legislative impunity, and the ineffective role of critical institutions such as anti-corruption agencies and the judiciary in enforcing accountability. The study establishes that the persistence of these anomalies is largely attributable to systemic opacity, political interference, and inadequate enforcement of legal frameworks. Consequently, the study recommends comprehensive institutional reforms, strengthened legislative oversight, enhanced transparency mechanisms, judicial independence, and the adoption of stricter sanctions against financial misconduct. The study unequivocally asserts that without decisive and uncompromising reforms, the integrity of Nigeria’s governance system will remain fundamentally compromised, thereby perpetuating a cycle of economic stagnation and public distrust.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Tansian University (NG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Corruption and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.