Dynamic characterization factors and dynamic global warming potentials: a critical methodological review

The topic of dynamic LCA has received quite some attention since 2010. Especially dynamic characterization factors for assessing the climate impact of greenhouse gases have become more mainstream. Here we review the principles of these approaches. The seminal paper by Levasseur and co-authors from 2010 is analyzed in depth, along with several follow-up papers by a variety of authors. The emphasis in our analysis is on the modelling details and in some cases the numerical outcomes and the units. All papers that are analyzed contain unclear parts and possible mistakes. They also misquote the original proposal in several cases. We consider this as a potential threat to the scientific status of dynamic LCA and, by extension, to the scientific status of LCA. We provide several fixes in the modelling details. We also propose a way forward to better understand and communicate the principles of dynamic LCA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-026-02634-z
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic characterization factors and dynamic global warming potentials: a critical methodological review

Reinout Heijungs
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Dynamic characterization factors and dynamic global warming potentials: a critical methodological review

Reinout Heijungs
article en

Abstract

The topic of dynamic LCA has received quite some attention since 2010. Especially dynamic characterization factors for assessing the climate impact of greenhouse gases have become more mainstream. Here we review the principles of these approaches. The seminal paper by Levasseur and co-authors from 2010 is analyzed in depth, along with several follow-up papers by a variety of authors. The emphasis in our analysis is on the modelling details and in some cases the numerical outcomes and the units. All papers that are analyzed contain unclear parts and possible mistakes. They also misquote the original proposal in several cases. We consider this as a potential threat to the scientific status of dynamic LCA and, by extension, to the scientific status of LCA. We provide several fixes in the modelling details. We also propose a way forward to better understand and communicate the principles of dynamic LCA.

The International Journal of Life Cycle AssessmentVol. 31(5)
Leiden University (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dynamic characterization factors and dynamic global warming potentials: a critical methodological review — Reinout Heijungs · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS