Sample size shapes metabarcoding-driven biodiversity assessments across body sizes in soil

Understanding how sample size influences biodiversity detection across taxonomic groups differing in body size is critical for designing robust and cost-efficient metabarcoding studies of soil eukaryotes. Using a soil mass gradient (0.25-32 g) combined with a universal 18S rRNA metabarcoding approach, we quantified how sample mass shapes diversity estimates across eukaryotic taxa. Diversity metrics (richness and inverse Simpson diversity; q = 0, 2) and community dispersion exhibited clear body size-dependent responses. Larger-bodied taxa (e.g., Nematoda, Collembola, Insecta) showed pronounced increases in detected diversity and reduced community dispersion with increasing soil mass, indicating that small soil samples fail to capture their full diversity. Conversely, microeukaryotic groups such as fungi and protists displayed weak or even negative relationships with increasing soil mass, implying limited improvement in detection with increased sampling effort. These findings demonstrate the interactive effect organismal body size and sampling approach on the detection of soil biodiversity. We suggest optimal soil sample sizes for different groups of soil biota, and propose that a taxon-specific analytical framework can enhance both the ecological representativeness and cost efficiency in metabarcoding-based soil biodiversity assessments and monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Soil Ecology
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2026.107400
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Sample size shapes metabarcoding-driven biodiversity assessments across body sizes in soil

Stephanie D. Jurburg, Antonis Chatzinotas, Nico Eisenhauer, Lu Wang et al.
Applied Soil Ecology
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

Sample size shapes metabarcoding-driven biodiversity assessments across body sizes in soil

Stephanie D. Jurburg, Antonis Chatzinotas, Nico Eisenhauer, Lu Wang, April Leonar, Simone Cesarz
article en

Abstract

Understanding how sample size influences biodiversity detection across taxonomic groups differing in body size is critical for designing robust and cost-efficient metabarcoding studies of soil eukaryotes. Using a soil mass gradient (0.25-32 g) combined with a universal 18S rRNA metabarcoding approach, we quantified how sample mass shapes diversity estimates across eukaryotic taxa. Diversity metrics (richness and inverse Simpson diversity; q = 0, 2) and community dispersion exhibited clear body size-dependent responses. Larger-bodied taxa (e.g., Nematoda, Collembola, Insecta) showed pronounced increases in detected diversity and reduced community dispersion with increasing soil mass, indicating that small soil samples fail to capture their full diversity. Conversely, microeukaryotic groups such as fungi and protists displayed weak or even negative relationships with increasing soil mass, implying limited improvement in detection with increased sampling effort. These findings demonstrate the interactive effect organismal body size and sampling approach on the detection of soil biodiversity. We suggest optimal soil sample sizes for different groups of soil biota, and propose that a taxon-specific analytical framework can enhance both the ecological representativeness and cost efficiency in metabarcoding-based soil biodiversity assessments and monitoring.

Applied Soil EcologyVol. 227
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
National Science Foundation, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.