Vaccine hesitancy and uptake during pregnancy: investigating the role of emotional mental imagery

BACKGROUND: Vaccine hesitancy and suboptimal vaccine uptake pose significant threats to public health, but modifiable psychological factors underpinning them are under-investigated. We examined the prevalence of spontaneous emotional mental imagery relating to infectious diseases and perinatal vaccines and its unique associations with vaccine hesitancy and uptake behaviour. METHODS: In a two-part longitudinal study, a sample of 411 English-speaking pregnant women attending a large public maternity hospital in Western Australia completed a baseline survey assessing levels of vaccine hesitancy and vaccine uptake (status and timing) during pregnancy for influenza, pertussis, and COVID-19. Vaccine uptake data were collected through official immunisation records. Spontaneous mental imagery was assessed using a novel paradigm comprised of risk-perception questions, after which participants were asked to indicate whether they experienced disease and vaccine-related mental imagery when completing risk-perception question. RESULTS: Vaccine hesitancy was lowest for pertussis and highest for COVID-19. Participants (38%) reported primarily negative mental images formulated from personal experiences, the news and social media. Over and above maternal vaccination intention and anticipated regret, the presence of negative vaccine imagery was associated with higher vaccine hesitancy for those not yet vaccinated for pertussis and influenza. The presence of positive vaccine imagery was independently associated with higher uptake likelihood and earlier uptake timing for pertussis only. Mental imagery was not associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy or uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine-related mental imagery represents a potential cognitive marker and modifiable intervention target for vaccine hesitancy. Findings should be interpreted considering limitations associated with real-world field research and the unique Western Australian pandemic context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science & Medicine
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119302
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vaccine hesitancy and uptake during pregnancy: investigating the role of emotional mental imagery

Julie L. Ji, Lies Notebaert, Joshua Lake, Colin Macleod et al.
Social Science & Medicine
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Vaccine hesitancy and uptake during pregnancy: investigating the role of emotional mental imagery

Julie L. Ji, Lies Notebaert, Joshua Lake, Colin Macleod, Zoe Bradfield, Katie Attwell, Julian Basanovic, Margie Danchin, Catherine Hughes, Jane Warland, Christopher C. Blyth
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vaccine hesitancy and suboptimal vaccine uptake pose significant threats to public health, but modifiable psychological factors underpinning them are under-investigated. We examined the prevalence of spontaneous emotional mental imagery relating to infectious diseases and perinatal vaccines and its unique associations with vaccine hesitancy and uptake behaviour. METHODS: In a two-part longitudinal study, a sample of 411 English-speaking pregnant women attending a large public maternity hospital in Western Australia completed a baseline survey assessing levels of vaccine hesitancy and vaccine uptake (status and timing) during pregnancy for influenza, pertussis, and COVID-19. Vaccine uptake data were collected through official immunisation records. Spontaneous mental imagery was assessed using a novel paradigm comprised of risk-perception questions, after which participants were asked to indicate whether they experienced disease and vaccine-related mental imagery when completing risk-perception question. RESULTS: Vaccine hesitancy was lowest for pertussis and highest for COVID-19. Participants (38%) reported primarily negative mental images formulated from personal experiences, the news and social media. Over and above maternal vaccination intention and anticipated regret, the presence of negative vaccine imagery was associated with higher vaccine hesitancy for those not yet vaccinated for pertussis and influenza. The presence of positive vaccine imagery was independently associated with higher uptake likelihood and earlier uptake timing for pertussis only. Mental imagery was not associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy or uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine-related mental imagery represents a potential cognitive marker and modifiable intervention target for vaccine hesitancy. Findings should be interpreted considering limitations associated with real-world field research and the unique Western Australian pandemic context.

Social Science & MedicineVol. 401
Royal Children's Hospital (AU), The Kids Research Institute Australia (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), University of Exeter (GB), Princess Margaret Hospital for Children (AU), King Edward Memorial Hospital (AU), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU), University of Plymouth (GB)
Channel 7 Telethon Trust, Forrest Research Foundation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.