Advancing Systemic Risk Assessment for Complex, Interdependent Systems: A Research Agenda

Engineering risk assessment has traditionally focused on direct impacts to individual assets or systems. However, as society's most notable risks increasingly stem from complex, interdependent systems, conventional methods fail to capture the cascading consequences and deepening uncertainty. Addressing this gap requires developing or extending assessment methods. To guide such development and align research efforts, this paper introduces a taxonomy of risk assessment methods. The taxonomy classifies methods by their capability to assess different types of consequences and systemic behaviors. Tier 1 methods can assess direct, localized impacts; Tier 2 methods also capture cascading consequences in interconnected systems; Tier 3 methods also address emergent, transformative, and uncertain dynamics. We identify key system and knowledge characteristics that challenge existing methods and outline research priorities necessary to advance systemic risk assessment: Analyzing consequences, structuring uncertainty, evaluating trade-offs, strengthening causal inference, ensuring defensibility, and communicating results. This agenda aims to guide future research towards risk assessment methods suitable for the systemic risk challenges society increasingly faces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risk Analysis
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70243
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing Systemic Risk Assessment for Complex, Interdependent Systems: A Research Agenda

Benjamin Rachunok, Allison Reilly, D. Bristow, K. Hardaway et al.
Risk Analysis
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
article

Advancing Systemic Risk Assessment for Complex, Interdependent Systems: A Research Agenda

Benjamin Rachunok, Allison Reilly, D. Bristow, K. Hardaway, Tom Logan, Jessica Boakye, J. Johansson, Gemma Cremen, P. Schweizer, D. Johnson
article en

Abstract

Engineering risk assessment has traditionally focused on direct impacts to individual assets or systems. However, as society's most notable risks increasingly stem from complex, interdependent systems, conventional methods fail to capture the cascading consequences and deepening uncertainty. Addressing this gap requires developing or extending assessment methods. To guide such development and align research efforts, this paper introduces a taxonomy of risk assessment methods. The taxonomy classifies methods by their capability to assess different types of consequences and systemic behaviors. Tier 1 methods can assess direct, localized impacts; Tier 2 methods also capture cascading consequences in interconnected systems; Tier 3 methods also address emergent, transformative, and uncertain dynamics. We identify key system and knowledge characteristics that challenge existing methods and outline research priorities necessary to advance systemic risk assessment: Analyzing consequences, structuring uncertainty, evaluating trade-offs, strengthening causal inference, ensuring defensibility, and communicating results. This agenda aims to guide future research towards risk assessment methods suitable for the systemic risk challenges society increasingly faces.

Risk AnalysisVol. 46(5)
North Carolina State University (US), University of Canterbury (NZ), Lund University (SE), University of Victoria (CA), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Research Institute for Sustainability at GFZ (DE), University College London (GB), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Royal Society Te Apārangi, Ministry for Business Innovation and Employment, HORIZON EUROPE Climate, Energy and Mobility
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.