Research on Comprehensive Evaluation Model for Aeroengine Alternative Schemes Based on Multi-Source Data Fusion

During the demonstration phase of the aeroengine alternative schemes, the evaluation of alternative schemes plays a critical role in determining the most viable options. However, the complexity and diversity of evaluation factors pose challenges to traditional evaluation methods. To tackle this issue, integrating pertinent data from diverse sources is imperative for analysis to identify the optimal scheme. A comprehensive evaluation model combing fuzzy mathematics theory and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been established to integrate quantitative and qualitative factors. Firstly, a comprehensive evaluation index system for aeroengines in the demonstration stage is established. Secondly, utilizing fuzzy mathematics theory, the unified processing of quantitative and qualitative indicators from multiple data sources is completed. Thirdly, employing the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), weight coefficients of evaluation indicators at each level are determined. Finally, the weighted sum of each indicator is calculated step by step to derive the comprehensive evaluation results for each alternative scheme. A case study is conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model in evaluating aeroengine alternative schemes. By comparing the evaluation results with the PUGH matrix method, it is demonstrated that this comprehensive evaluation model is not only reasonable and feasible but also possesses higher credibility. The model established for alternative schemes in this study serves as a crucial foundation for the scientific selection of the optimal scheme in the demonstration stage.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636106001/pdf
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on Comprehensive Evaluation Model for Aeroengine Alternative Schemes Based on Multi-Source Data Fusion

Xie Ye-ping, Ji Zi-fei, Li Rui-Jun, Wang Chen
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Research on Comprehensive Evaluation Model for Aeroengine Alternative Schemes Based on Multi-Source Data Fusion

Xie Ye-ping, Ji Zi-fei, Li Rui-Jun, Wang Chen
article en

Abstract

During the demonstration phase of the aeroengine alternative schemes, the evaluation of alternative schemes plays a critical role in determining the most viable options. However, the complexity and diversity of evaluation factors pose challenges to traditional evaluation methods. To tackle this issue, integrating pertinent data from diverse sources is imperative for analysis to identify the optimal scheme. A comprehensive evaluation model combing fuzzy mathematics theory and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been established to integrate quantitative and qualitative factors. Firstly, a comprehensive evaluation index system for aeroengines in the demonstration stage is established. Secondly, utilizing fuzzy mathematics theory, the unified processing of quantitative and qualitative indicators from multiple data sources is completed. Thirdly, employing the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), weight coefficients of evaluation indicators at each level are determined. Finally, the weighted sum of each indicator is calculated step by step to derive the comprehensive evaluation results for each alternative scheme. A case study is conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model in evaluating aeroengine alternative schemes. By comparing the evaluation results with the PUGH matrix method, it is demonstrated that this comprehensive evaluation model is not only reasonable and feasible but also possesses higher credibility. The model established for alternative schemes in this study serves as a crucial foundation for the scientific selection of the optimal scheme in the demonstration stage.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.