Three-dimensional models of skeletal muscle under tension: a systematic review and core outcome set

Biologically representative three-dimensional (3D) skeletal muscle models are required to understand the mechanisms underpinning muscle disease. The primary aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the current literature on 3D skeletal muscle models under tension. Its secondary aim is to explore injury mechanisms and generate a novel Core Outcome Set (COS) for reporting of such models. In vitro studies that utilised any skeletal muscle cell types cultured with an anchor system imposing axial strain were eligible for inclusion. A modified Delphi approach using corresponding authors of included studies was then developed to obtain a COS. This systematic review was reported in compliance with the PRISMA 2020 checklist. 37 articles were included. Of these, 7 articles induced an injury in their model. Cell lines used were both human and animal. Immunohistochemical testing on models revealed greatest concordance for myosin heavy chain (MHC), alpha actinin, and Pax7 as a means of demonstrating striated muscle. The final COS agreed on multiple reporting criteria for the validation of models based on morphology, phenotype and function. This systematic review summarises the current literature and has developed core outcome reporting for models of 3D skeletal muscle that impose axial strain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Regenerative Medicine
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-026-00464-z
Primary Topic
Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three-dimensional models of skeletal muscle under tension: a systematic review and core outcome set

Robert Staruch, Lieven Thorrez, Antonio Musarò, Nenad Bursac et al.
npj Regenerative Medicine
Muscle Physiology and Disorders
article

Three-dimensional models of skeletal muscle under tension: a systematic review and core outcome set

Robert Staruch, Lieven Thorrez, Antonio Musarò, Nenad Bursac, Robin O. Cleveland, H H Vandenburgh, Kazunori Shimizu, Neal Thurley, Jolet Y. Mimpen, Sarah Snelling, Ng Shyh‐Chang, Kunal Bhanot, Roger Kamm, George Truskey, Rory Rickard, Core Outcome Set Review Group
article en

Abstract

Biologically representative three-dimensional (3D) skeletal muscle models are required to understand the mechanisms underpinning muscle disease. The primary aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the current literature on 3D skeletal muscle models under tension. Its secondary aim is to explore injury mechanisms and generate a novel Core Outcome Set (COS) for reporting of such models. In vitro studies that utilised any skeletal muscle cell types cultured with an anchor system imposing axial strain were eligible for inclusion. A modified Delphi approach using corresponding authors of included studies was then developed to obtain a COS. This systematic review was reported in compliance with the PRISMA 2020 checklist. 37 articles were included. Of these, 7 articles induced an injury in their model. Cell lines used were both human and animal. Immunohistochemical testing on models revealed greatest concordance for myosin heavy chain (MHC), alpha actinin, and Pax7 as a means of demonstrating striated muscle. The final COS agreed on multiple reporting criteria for the validation of models based on morphology, phenotype and function. This systematic review summarises the current literature and has developed core outcome reporting for models of 3D skeletal muscle that impose axial strain.

npj Regenerative Medicine
Duke University (US), Brown University (US), Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre (GB), John Radcliffe Hospital (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Birmingham Research Park (GB), Department of Embryology (US), Bodle Technologies (United Kingdom) (GB), Institute of Zoology (CN), Nagoya University (JP), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Muscle Physiology and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.